Abstract
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of biological herbicide formulas on smallholder coffee plantations in various agro-ecological conditions, namely smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau. The study concluded that the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species. The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%. These six types of weeds dominate the land at 79.4%. Meanwhile, in the plateau, there were 20 types of weeds. The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%. These ten types of weeds dominate the land for 79.3%. Herbicides formulated Unihaz 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were effective in controlling weeds in smallholder coffee plantations, both in the medium plains and plateau.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
The weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species.
CoffeaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
Claim · model-written summary
The plateau coffee fields had 20 types of weeds.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e3“there were 20 types of weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Six weed types dominated the medium plains coffee land at 79.4%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e4“These six types of weeds dominate the land at 79.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten weed types dominated the plateau coffee land at 79.3%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e5“These ten types of weeds dominate the land for 79.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Cynodon dactilon was a dominant weed at 38.1% in medium plains coffee fields.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Asystasia gangetica was a dominant weed at 19.3% in medium plains coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Asystasia gangetica
Asystasia gangeticae6weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse6
- Value
- 19.3%e6
- Setting
- medium plainse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Ageratum conyzoides was a dominant weed at 10% in medium plains coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Ageratum conyzoides
Ageratum conyzoidese6weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse6
- Value
- 10%e6
- Setting
- medium plainse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Borreria latifolia was a dominant weed at 5.4% in medium plains coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Borreria latifolia
.jpg?width=60)
Spermacoce latifoliae6weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse6
- Value
- 5.4%e6
- Setting
- medium plainse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Acmella paniculata was a dominant weed at 3.3% in medium plains coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Acmella paniculata
Acmella paniculatae6weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse6
- Value
- 3.3%e6
- Setting
- medium plainse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Clydemia hirta was a dominant weed at 3.3% in medium plains coffee fields.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the weeds found in the medium plains coffee fields were 17 species”
e6“The dominant weeds were Cynodon dactilon 38.1%, Asystasia gangetica 19.3%, Ageratum conyzoides 10%, Borreria latifolia 5.4%, Acmella paniculata 3.3%, and Clydemia hirta 3.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Brachiaria ramosa was a dominant weed at 17.8% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Brachiaria ramosa
Urochloa ramosae7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 17.8%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Synedrella nodiflora was a dominant weed at 10.4% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Synedrella nodiflora
Synedrella nodiflorae7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 10.4%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Digitaria cyliaris and Mikania micrantha were each a dominant weed at 8.7% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Digitaria cyliarise7weed
- Second interactor
- Mikania micrantha
Mikania micranthae7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 8.7%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Brachiaria setigera was a dominant weed at 8.5% in plateau coffee fields.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Dryopteris filixmas was a dominant weed at 7.8% in plateau coffee fields.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Ottochloa nodosa was a dominant weed at 5.7% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Ottochloa nodosaOttochloa nodosae7weed
- Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 5.7%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Hyptis rhomboidea was a dominant weed at 4.3% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Hyptis rhomboidea
Hyptis rhomboideae7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 4.3%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Brachiaria reptans was a dominant weed at 3.9% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Brachiaria reptans
Urochloa reptanse7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 3.9%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Clidemia hirta was a dominant weed at 3.5% in plateau coffee fields.
- Interactor
- Clidemia hirta
Miconia crenatae7weed - Outcome
- dominant weedse7
- Value
- 3.5%e7
- Setting
- plateaue2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“smallholder coffee fields in the medium plains and plateau”
e7“The dominant weeds were Brachiaria ramosa 17.8%, Synedrella nodiflora 10.4%, Digitaria cyliaris 8.7%, Mikania micrantha, 8.7%, Brachiaria setigera 8.5%, Dryopteris filixmas 7.8%, Ottochloa nodosa. 5.7%, Hyptis rhomboidea 4.3%, Brachiaria reptans 3.9%, and Clidemia hirta 3.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides formulated Unihaz 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were effective in controlling weeds in smallholder coffee plantations in the medium plains and plateau.
- Treatment
- Herbicides formulated Unihaz 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7e1
- Interactor
- weedse1weed
- Outcome
- effective in controlling weedse1
- Setting
- medium plains and plateaue1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Herbicides formulated Unihaz 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were effective in controlling weeds in smallholder coffee plantations, both in the medium plains and plateau”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · weed · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.