Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

The Effect of N Fertilizer Application Timing on Wheat Yield on Chernozem Soil

Marko M. Kostić; Aristotelis C. Tagarakis; Nataša Ljubičić; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The challenges of the global food supply and environment conservation require ongoing scientific observations of soil-to-plant and plant-to-environment interactions with the aim of improving agriculture resource management. This study included observations of winter wheat yield and biomass of four varieties over three consecutive growing seasons and four site-year cases to assess the effects of nitrogen (N) fertilization rate and time of application on grain yield and biomass. For different wheat varieties, the full factorial design was performed, where factorial combinations of year, location, fall and spring N applications were laid out in a randomized complete block design. The N rate significantly influenced grain yield and biomass production efficiency. The time of N application had a highly significant effect on grain yield, biomass and NUE traits. The N rate of 120 kg ha−1 was recognized as a breakpoint over which the grain yield and biomass showed a downtrend. N application in the fall had a significantly higher impact on grain yield and biomass compared to spring N application. The major contribution of wheat variability production belongs to seasonal climate circumstances (<85%) and consequential intrinsic soil properties. The average difference of grain yield between varieties was 15.75%, and 12% of biomass, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate significantly influenced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate significantly influenced grain yield and biomass production efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate significantly influenced wheat biomass production efficiency.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
biomass production efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate significantly influenced grain yield and biomass production efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application time had a highly significant effect on wheat grain yield.

Treatment
time of N applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time of N application had a highly significant effect on grain yield, biomass and NUE traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application time had a highly significant effect on wheat biomass.

Treatment
time of N applicatione0
Outcome
biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time of N application had a highly significant effect on grain yield, biomass and NUE traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application time had a highly significant effect on wheat NUE traits.

Treatment
time of N applicatione0
Outcome
NUE traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time of N application had a highly significant effect on grain yield, biomass and NUE traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen, wheat grain yield trended downward.

Treatment
N rate of 120 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
downtrende0
Value
120 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate of 120 kg ha−1 was recognized as a breakpoint over which the grain yield and biomass showed a downtrend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen, wheat biomass trended downward.

Treatment
N rate of 120 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
downtrende0
Value
120 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate of 120 kg ha−1 was recognized as a breakpoint over which the grain yield and biomass showed a downtrend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall nitrogen application had a greater effect on wheat grain yield than spring application.

Treatment
N application in the falle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
spring N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application in the fall had a significantly higher impact on grain yield and biomass compared to spring N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall nitrogen application had a greater effect on wheat biomass than spring application.

Treatment
N application in the falle0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
spring N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application in the fall had a significantly higher impact on grain yield and biomass compared to spring N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal climate circumstances and soil properties accounted for the major contribution to wheat production variability.

Outcome
wheat variability productione0
Value
<85%e0
Qualifier
intrinsic soil propertiese0
Setting
seasonal climate circumstancese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major contribution of wheat variability production belongs to seasonal climate circumstances (<85%) and consequential intrinsic soil properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat grain yield differed between varieties by 15.75%.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
differencee0
Value
15.75%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average difference of grain yield between varieties was 15.75%, and 12% of biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average wheat biomass differed between varieties by 12%.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
differencee0
Value
12%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average difference of grain yield between varieties was 15.75%, and 12% of biomass, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.