Paper · 2002 · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide

Arnold J. Bloom; David R. Smart; Duy T. Nguyen; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
217
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Simultaneous measurements of CO 2 and O 2 fluxes from wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) shoots indicated that short-term exposures to elevated CO 2 concentrations diverted photosynthetic reductant from NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{3}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} or NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{2}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} reduction to CO 2 fixation. With longer exposures to elevated CO 2 , wheat leaves showed a diminished capacity for NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{3}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} photoassimilation at any CO 2 concentration. Moreover, high bicarbonate levels impeded NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{2}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} translocation into chloroplasts isolated from wheat or pea leaves. These results support the hypothesis that elevated CO 2 inhibits NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{3}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} photoassimilation. Accordingly, when wheat plants received NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{3}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} rather than NH \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{4}^{+}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} as a nitrogen source, CO 2 enhancement of shoot growth halved and CO 2 inhibition of shoot protein doubled. This result will likely have major implications for the ability of wheat to use NO \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} \begin{equation*}{\mathrm{_{3}^{-}}}\end{equation*}\end{document} as a nitrogen source under elevated CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-term exposure to elevated CO2 diverted photosynthetic reductant from nitrate or nitrite reduction to CO2 fixation in wheat shoots.

Treatment
short-term exposures to elevated CO 2 concentrationse0
Outcome
photosynthetic reductante0
Direction
divertede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“short-term exposures to elevated CO 2 concentrations diverted photosynthetic reductant from NO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With longer exposure to elevated CO2, wheat leaves showed a diminished capacity for nitrate photoassimilation at any CO2 concentration.

Treatment
longer exposures to elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
capacitye1
Direction
diminishede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“With longer exposures to elevated CO 2 , wheat leaves showed a diminished capacity for NO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High bicarbonate levels impeded nitrite translocation into chloroplasts isolated from wheat leaves.

Treatment
high bicarbonate levelse2
Outcome
translocation into chloroplastse3
Direction
impedede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Moreover, high bicarbonate levels impeded NO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1234 · show in text ↑
e3

“translocation into chloroplasts isolated from wheat or pea leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When wheat received nitrate rather than ammonium, CO2 enhancement of shoot growth was halved.

Treatment
nitrogen sourcee5
Outcome
CO 2 enhancement of shoot growthe4
Direction
halvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“CO 2 enhancement of shoot growth halved and CO 2 inhibition of shoot protein doubled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2565–2649 · show in text ↑
e5

“as a nitrogen source under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3008–3048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When wheat received nitrate rather than ammonium, CO2 inhibition of shoot protein was doubled.

Treatment
nitrogen sourcee5
Outcome
CO 2 inhibition of shoot proteine4
Direction
doublede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“CO 2 enhancement of shoot growth halved and CO 2 inhibition of shoot protein doubled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2565–2649 · show in text ↑
e5

“as a nitrogen source under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3008–3048 · show in text ↑

hydrogencarbonate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 23 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.