Paper · 2021 · Scientific Reports

Improving wheat grain yield via promotion of water and nitrogen utilization in arid areas

Yan Tan; Qiang Chai; Guang Li; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Crop yield is limited by water and nitrogen (N) availability. However, in Hexi Corridor of northwestern China, water scarcity and excessive fertilizer N in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production causes serious conflicts between water and N supply and crop demand. A field experiment was conducted from 2016 to 2018 to evaluate whether reducing of irrigation and fertilizer N will reduce grain yield of wheat. There were two irrigation quotas (192 and 240 mm) and three fertilizer N rates (135, 180, and 225 kg N ha −1 ). The results showed that reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1 reduced water uptake, water uptake efficiency, and N uptake of spring wheat as compared to local practice (i.e., 240 mm irrigation and 225 kg N ha −1 fertilizer). Whereas, it improved water and N utilization efficiency, and water and N productivity. Consequently, the irrigation and N rate reduced treatment achieved the same quantity of grain yield as local practice. The path analysis showed that interaction effect between irrigation and N fertilization may attributable to the improvement of grain yield with lower irrigation and N rate. The enhanced water and N utilization allows us to conclude that irrigation quota at 192 mm coupled with fertilizer N rate at 180 kg N ha −1 can be used as an efficient practice for wheat production in arid irrigation areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen reduced water uptake in wheat.

Treatment
reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
local practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1 reduced water uptake, water uptake efficiency, and N uptake of spring wheat as compared to local practice (i.e., 240 mm irrigation and 225 kg N ha −1 fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–776 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen reduced water uptake efficiency in wheat.

Treatment
reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
water uptake efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
local practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1 reduced water uptake, water uptake efficiency, and N uptake of spring wheat as compared to local practice (i.e., 240 mm irrigation and 225 kg N ha −1 fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–776 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen reduced N uptake in wheat.

Treatment
reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
local practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing irrigation to 192 mm and N rate to 180 kg N ha −1 reduced water uptake, water uptake efficiency, and N uptake of spring wheat as compared to local practice (i.e., 240 mm irrigation and 225 kg N ha −1 fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–776 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen improved water and N utilization efficiency in wheat.

Outcome
water and N utilization efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it improved water and N utilization efficiency, and water and N productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–863 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen improved water and N productivity in wheat.

Outcome
water and N productivitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it improved water and N utilization efficiency, and water and N productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–863 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation and nitrogen same quantity grain yield in wheat.

Treatment
irrigation and N rate reduced treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
same quantitye0
Comparator
local practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation and N rate reduced treatment achieved the same quantity of grain yield as local practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–982 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by nitrogen interaction was linked to grain yield improvement at lower inputs.

Treatment
irrigation and N fertilizatione0
Outcome
improvement of grain yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effect between irrigation and N fertilization may attributable to the improvement of grain yield with lower irrigation and N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1155 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–205 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 192 mm irrigation with 180 kg N ha −1 fertilizer for wheat production in arid areas.

Treatment
irrigation quota at 192 mm coupled with fertilizer N rate at 180 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
efficient practice for wheat productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation quota at 192 mm coupled with fertilizer N rate at 180 kg N ha −1 can be used as an efficient practice for wheat production in arid irrigation areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1379 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.