Paper · 2021 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Influence of Rice Straw Extract and Amino Acids on the Growth, Yield and Chemical Parameters of some Crops

Mervat Hamed; Shreen Ahmed; Wafaa Hafez

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is increasing concern about environmental contamination risks associated with the extensive use of mineral fertilizer in crops production. The aim of this study is to evaluate rice straw extract as natural fertilizer and suitable alternative to nitrogen mineral fertilizer. Two successive field experiments were carried out at Giza, Agricultural Research Station, during two seasons of summer and winter /2015/2016 to study the effect of rice straw extract as soil addition and soaking seed with or without amino acids on yield of maize and wheat crops. Maize and wheat seeds were soaked in aqueous solution of rice straw extract without or with amino acids for 6, 12, 24 hours. The results indicated that there are significant differences between average of grain and biological yield of maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha), protein yield (1934.37 kg/ha) and N, P uptake (322.97, 129.4 kg/ha) by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer. Contrary, maize is better adapted and produce more yield than wheat, the data regarding grain and straw yield of wheat (8.97 and 22.1 t/ha) and protein yield (1256.91 kg/ha) and N uptake (228.45 kg/ha) was observed by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract only compared to nitrogen fertilizer. It can be concluded that rice straw extract as natural fertilizer with or without amino acids could be suitable alternative to nitrogen mineral fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield under rice straw extract and 12-hour soaking with amino acids differed significantly from nitrogen fertilizer and averaged 15.59 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acidse1
Outcome
grain and biological yield of maizee0
Value
15.59 and 23.56 t/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and biological yield of maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize biological yield under this treatment differed significantly from nitrogen fertilizer and averaged 23.56 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acidse1
Outcome
biological yield of maizee0
Value
23.56 t/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biological yield of maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–823 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize protein yield under this treatment differed significantly from nitrogen fertilizer and was 1934.37 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acidse1
Outcome
protein yielde0
Value
1934.37 kg/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha), protein yield (1934.37 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–854 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize nitrogen uptake under this treatment differed significantly from nitrogen fertilizer and was 322.97 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acidse1
Outcome
N, P uptakee0
Value
322.97, 129.4 kg/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha), protein yield (1934.37 kg/ha) and N, P uptake (322.97, 129.4 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize phosphorus uptake under this treatment differed significantly from nitrogen fertilizer and was 129.4 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acidse1
Outcome
P uptakee0
Value
129.4 kg/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (15.59 and 23.56 t/ha), protein yield (1934.37 kg/ha) and N, P uptake (322.97, 129.4 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 12 hours in rice straw extract mixed with amino acids as natural fertilizer compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield with rice straw extract and six-hour seed soaking was 8.97 t/ha compared with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract onlye1
Outcome
grain and straw yield of wheate0
Value
8.97 and 22.1 t/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain and straw yield of wheat (8.97 and 22.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract only compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw yield with rice straw extract and six-hour seed soaking was 22.1 t/ha compared with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract onlye1
Outcome
straw yield of wheate0
Value
22.1 t/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield of wheat (8.97 and 22.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract only compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat protein yield with rice straw extract and six-hour seed soaking was 1256.91 kg/ha compared with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract onlye1
Outcome
protein yielde0
Value
1256.91 kg/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (8.97 and 22.1 t/ha) and protein yield (1256.91 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract only compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat nitrogen uptake with rice straw extract and six-hour seed soaking was 228.45 kg/ha compared with nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract onlye1
Outcome
N uptakee0
Value
228.45 kg/hae0
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (8.97 and 22.1 t/ha) and protein yield (1256.91 kg/ha) and N uptake (228.45 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“by application of rice straw extract and seed soaking for 6 hours with rice straw extract only compared to nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize produced more yield than wheat.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize is better adapted and produce more yield than wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1127 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude rice straw extract with or without amino acids could substitute for mineral nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
rice straw extract as natural fertilizer with or without amino acidse0
Outcome
suitable alternative to nitrogen mineral fertilizerse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

t0

“some Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“rice straw extract as natural fertilizer with or without amino acids could be suitable alternative to nitrogen mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1558 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Oryza sativa · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

125 papers: 118 positive, 7 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

seed treatment · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

seed treatment · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 150 positive, 15 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.