Paper · 2021 · Microorganisms

Examining the Effects of the Nitrogen Environment on Growth and N2-Fixation of Endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings by Applying 11C Radiotracing

Spenser Waller; Stacy L. Wilder; Michael J. Schueller; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Herbaspirillum seropedicae, as an endophyte and prolific root colonizer of numerous cereal crops, occupies an important ecological niche in agriculture because of its ability to promote plant growth and potentially improve crop yield. More importantly, there exists the untapped potential to harness its ability, as a diazotroph, to fix atmospheric N2 as an alternative nitrogen resource to synthetic fertilizers. While mechanisms for plant growth promotion remain controversial, especially in cereal crops, one irrefutable fact is these microorganisms rely heavily on plant-borne carbon as their main energy source in support of their own growth and biological functions. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), a microbial function that is reliant on nitrogenase enzyme activity, is extremely sensitive to the localized nitrogen environment of the microorganism. However, whether internal root colonization can serve to shield the microorganisms and de-sensitize nitrogenase activity to changes in the soil nitrogen status remains unanswered. We used RAM10, a GFP-reporting strain of H. seropedicae, and administered radioactive 11CO2 tracer to intact 3-week-old maize leaves and followed 11C-photosynthates to sites within intact roots where actively fluorescing microbial colonies assimilated the tracer. We examined the influence of administering either 1 mM or 10 mM nitrate during plant growth on microbial demands for plant-borne 11C. Nitrogenase activity was also examined under the same growth conditions using the acetylene reduction assay. We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate. However, carbon availability was significantly diminished under low nitrate growth due to reduced host CO2 fixation and reduced allocation of carbon resources to the roots. This response of the host caused significant inhibition of microbial growth. In summary, internal root colonization did little to shield these endophytic microorganisms from the nitrogen environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate increased endophyte nitrogenase activity relative to high nitrate.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Treatment
low nitratee0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate increased microbial demand for plant-borne carbon relative to high nitrate.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Treatment
low nitratee0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
microbial demands for plant-borne carbone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate significantly diminished carbon availability.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Treatment
low nitratee0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
carbon availabilitye0
Direction
diminishede0
Comparator
high nitratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, carbon availability was significantly diminished under low nitrate growth due to reduced host CO2 fixation and reduced allocation of carbon resources to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate reduced host CO2 fixation.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Treatment
low nitratee0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
host CO2 fixatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
high nitratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, carbon availability was significantly diminished under low nitrate growth due to reduced host CO2 fixation and reduced allocation of carbon resources to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrate reduced carbon allocation to roots.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Treatment
low nitratee0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
allocation of carbon resources to the rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
high nitratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, carbon availability was significantly diminished under low nitrate growth due to reduced host CO2 fixation and reduced allocation of carbon resources to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found that plant growth under low nitrate resulted in higher nitrogenase activity as well as higher microbial demands for plant-borne carbon than plant growth under high nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1729 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The host response significantly inhibited microbial growth.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
microbial growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
This response of the hoste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This response of the host caused significant inhibition of microbial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Internal root colonization offered little shielding from the nitrogen environment.

Taxon
maize seedlingsZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum seropedicaeHerbaspirillum seropedicaet0symbiont
Outcome
did little to shield these endophytic microorganisms from the nitrogen environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In summary, internal root colonization did little to shield these endophytic microorganisms from the nitrogen environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Herbaspirillum seropedicae in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–135 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · Herbaspirillum seropedicae · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.