Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The effectiveness of rhizosphere bacteria in inducing the resistance of maize to downy mildew, Peronosclerospora philipinensis

N Djaenuddin; M Azrai; T Kuswinanti; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The aim of study was to determine the efficacy of bacterial isolates from the rhizosphere in influencing the resistance of maize to downy mildew by measuring the accumulated concentration of salicylic acid. Treatments were based on a fully randomized 2-factor design with 3 levels of; factor I (bacteria) 3 levels (b0 = no bacteria, b1 = Bacillus paramycoides Ga-3, b2 = B. cereus Si-4) and factor II (salicylic acid) 2 levels (as0 = 0 g/L and as1 = 2 g/L). The research was carried out at the greenhouse and plant pathology laboratory, Indonesian Cereal Research Institute (ICERI), from March to July 2020. Each treatment combination was tested on three varieties of maize, namely Anoman, Bima20, and Bima3. Hence there were 18 treatment combinations. Furthermore, the results showed that rhizosphere bacteria and salicylic acid could control downy mildew in maize. In the case of the Bima20 variety, the combined treatment of B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acid had the lowest incidence of disease at 13%. Meanwhile, treatment of B. cereus Si4 + salicylic acid in the Bima3 variety had the lowest incidence of disease by 26%. Considering the results, the enrichment of salicylic acid content was highest at 9.6 ppm on maize which was applied with the rhizosphere bacterium B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere bacteria and salicylic acid could control downy mildew in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
rhizosphere bacteria and salicylic acide0
Interactor
Peronosclerospora philipinensist0pathogen
Outcome
downy mildewe0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize to downy mildew, Peronosclerospora philipinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere bacteria and salicylic acid could control downy mildew in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize variety Bima20, B. paramycoides Ga3 plus salicylic acid gave the lowest disease incidence, 13%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Bima20e0
Treatment
B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acide0
Interactor
Peronosclerospora philipinensist0pathogen
Second interactor
B. paramycoides Ga3Bacillus paramycoidese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of diseasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize to downy mildew, Peronosclerospora philipinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the case of the Bima20 variety, the combined treatment of B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acid had the lowest incidence of disease at 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize variety Bima3, B. cereus Si4 plus salicylic acid gave the lowest disease incidence, 26%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Bima3e0
Treatment
B. cereus Si4 + salicylic acide0
Interactor
Peronosclerospora philipinensist0pathogen
Second interactor
B. cereus Si4Bacillus cereuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of diseasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · Second interactorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize to downy mildew, Peronosclerospora philipinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment of B. cereus Si4 + salicylic acid in the Bima3 variety had the lowest incidence of disease by 26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid content in maize was highest, 9.6 ppm, with B. paramycoides Ga3 plus salicylic acid.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
rhizosphere bacterium B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acide0
Interactor
B. paramycoides Ga3Bacillus paramycoidese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
salicylic acid contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.6 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize to downy mildew, Peronosclerospora philipinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the enrichment of salicylic acid content was highest at 9.6 ppm on maize which was applied with the rhizosphere bacterium B. paramycoides Ga3 + salicylic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1321 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Bacillus paramycoides · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: hormones · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus cereus · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 93 positive, 67 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.