Paper · 2021 · Maǧallaẗ abḥāṯ kulliyyaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ al-asāsiyyaẗ/Mağallaẗ abḥāṯ kulliyyaẗ al-tarbiyaẗ al-asāsiyyaẗ

Effect of Residuses Clover and Yellow Corn (spring lug) under The effect of Different Tillage Systems in the Growth Characteristics and Yield of the yellow Corn crop (autumn lug) Cultivated according to Crop Rotation system in Soil Gypsiferous

H.A.S. Jeghata Jeghata; N. M. Muhawish Muhawish

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop rotation system was practiced under the effect of different tillage systems to find their influence on the growth characteristics and yield of corn (autumn season) inagypsiferous soil. Clover and corn crop were planed in spring season 2018-2019. Under the effect no tillage system (NT) and the reduced tillage (RT) and conventional tillage (CT) , and keeping on levels (0% , 50% , 100%) for their residues after experiment harvesting. In autumn season planted corn was (autumn season) in the same site of spring season under the same effect of the same factors studied in the first experiment in addition to the factor of the percentage of residues of the previous crop. Growth characteristics, plant height and dry matter yield were studied. After harvesting, the yield characteristics were studied (number of rows, weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , grain yield) for each experimental unit to determine the effect of the studied factors on it. Results showed that there was no significant difference between the NT system and the RT system in the characteristic of plant height, both of which were significantly superior to the CT system, with a percentage greater than (2.13 and 1.9) % respectively. while for the dry matter yield the RT system was significantly superior to NT, with a percentage greater than (6.14)% and was not significant with CT. As for the yield characteristics the RT system significantly superior the NT system and the CT system in the characteristic (number of rows , weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) for the yield of maize (autumn season) and a percentage of superiority of (7.2 , 8.7 , 4.2 and 11.2) % respectively, compared to the lowest average. Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system. By increasing the level of residues from 0% to the level of 100%, the growth characteristics of plant height and dry matter increased significantly, the increase superior was (2.78 and 40.85)% , respectively. As for yield characteristics (weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) of corn yield (autumn season ) the level 100% superior on level of 0% from residues values ​​(263.34 g and 178.40 g and 6685.09 kg ha-1) and in the rate (10.5 , 7.6 and 16)%, respectively. As for the number of rows there was no significant between the levels and the three interferences treatment NT.C.C2Re100% and RT.C.C2Re100% gave the high significance in plant height a value of (198.33) cm for both. The treatment is NT.C.C2Re100% with a value of (5663.9) kg ha-1 in dry matter yield and the treatment is RT.C.C1Re 100% in the number of rows a value of (16.33) row sp-1 and the treatment NT.C.C2Re 100% in the weight of 500 seeds a value of (189.11) g and in the grain yield total value (7740.4) kg ha-1 compared to the other study treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NT and RT had no significant difference in plant height.

Treatment
NT systeme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
RT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that there was no significant difference between the NT system and the RT system in the characteristic of plant height, both of which were significantly superior to the CT system, with a percentage greater than (2.13 and 1.9) % respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NT plant height exceeded CT by 2.13%.

Treatment
NT systeme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
2.13e0
Comparator
CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that there was no significant difference between the NT system and the RT system in the characteristic of plant height, both of which were significantly superior to the CT system, with a percentage greater than (2.13 and 1.9) % respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT plant height exceeded CT by 1.9%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
1.9e0
Comparator
CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that there was no significant difference between the NT system and the RT system in the characteristic of plant height, both of which were significantly superior to the CT system, with a percentage greater than (2.13 and 1.9) % respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT dry matter yield exceeded NT by 6.14%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
6.14e0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while for the dry matter yield the RT system was significantly superior to NT, with a percentage greater than (6.14)% and was not significant with CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT dry matter yield did not differ significantly from CT.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while for the dry matter yield the RT system was significantly superior to NT, with a percentage greater than (6.14)% and was not significant with CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT exceeded NT and CT for number of rows by 7.2%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
number of rowse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
7.2e0
Comparator
NT system and the CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the yield characteristics the RT system significantly superior the NT system and the CT system in the characteristic (number of rows , weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) for the yield of maize (autumn season) and a percentage of superiority of (7.2 , 8.7 , 4.2 and 11.2) % respectively, compared to the lowest average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT exceeded NT and CT for weight of cobs by 8.7%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
weight of cobse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8.7e0
Comparator
NT system and the CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the yield characteristics the RT system significantly superior the NT system and the CT system in the characteristic (number of rows , weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) for the yield of maize (autumn season) and a percentage of superiority of (7.2 , 8.7 , 4.2 and 11.2) % respectively, compared to the lowest average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT exceeded NT and CT for weight of 500 seeds by 4.2%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
weight of 500 seedse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
4.2e0
Comparator
NT system and the CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the yield characteristics the RT system significantly superior the NT system and the CT system in the characteristic (number of rows , weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) for the yield of maize (autumn season) and a percentage of superiority of (7.2 , 8.7 , 4.2 and 11.2) % respectively, compared to the lowest average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT exceeded NT and CT for grain yield by 11.2%.

Treatment
RT systeme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
11.2e0
Comparator
NT system and the CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for the yield characteristics the RT system significantly superior the NT system and the CT system in the characteristic (number of rows , weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) for the yield of maize (autumn season) and a percentage of superiority of (7.2 , 8.7 , 4.2 and 11.2) % respectively, compared to the lowest average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for plant height.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
1.72e0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for dry matter.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8.66e0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for number of rows.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
number of rowse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for weight of sprouts.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
weight of sproutse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
14.8e0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for weight of 500 seeds.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
weight of 500 seedse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
7.2e0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover residues exceeded corn residues for grain yield.

Treatment
clover residuese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
15.5e0
Comparator
corn residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, clover residues were significantly superior over the corn residues (spring season) in plant height and dry matter in the rate of (1.72 and 8.66) % respectively, in percentase superior to (NS , 14.8 , 7.2 and 15.5 )% in the number of rows and weight of sprouts and weight of 500 seeds and the grain yield on respectively of the corn crop (autumn season) cultivated according to the crop rotation system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residues increased plant height by 2.78%.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.78e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By increasing the level of residues from 0% to the level of 100%, the growth characteristics of plant height and dry matter increased significantly, the increase superior was (2.78 and 40.85)% , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2327 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residues increased dry matter by 40.85%.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40.85e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By increasing the level of residues from 0% to the level of 100%, the growth characteristics of plant height and dry matter increased significantly, the increase superior was (2.78 and 40.85)% , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2327 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% residues, weight of cobs was 263.34 g and exceeded 0%.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
weight of cobse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
263.34 ge0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for yield characteristics (weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) of corn yield (autumn season ) the level 100% superior on level of 0% from residues values ​​(263.34 g and 178.40 g and 6685.09 kg ha-1) and in the rate (10.5 , 7.6 and 16)%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2602 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% residues, weight of 500 seeds was 178.40 g and exceeded 0%.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
weight of 500 seedse0
Direction
superiore0
Value
178.40 ge0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for yield characteristics (weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) of corn yield (autumn season ) the level 100% superior on level of 0% from residues values ​​(263.34 g and 178.40 g and 6685.09 kg ha-1) and in the rate (10.5 , 7.6 and 16)%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2602 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% residues, grain yield was 6685.09 kg ha-1 and exceeded 0%.

Treatment
100%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
6685.09 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As for yield characteristics (weight of cobs , weight of 500 seeds , and grain yield) of corn yield (autumn season ) the level 100% superior on level of 0% from residues values ​​(263.34 g and 178.40 g and 6685.09 kg ha-1) and in the rate (10.5 , 7.6 and 16)%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2602 · show in text ↑
t0

“yellow Corn crop (autumn lug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 149–178 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.