Paper · 2021 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

The influence of weather and climatic conditions on the phenological indicators and productivity of winter wheat cultivated by direct seeding technology in the arid zone of the Stavropol Territory

Elena Vyacheslavovna Pismennaya; Margarita Yurevna Azarova; Anna Anatolevna Belyaeva

18
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The studies were conducted in the arid zone of Stavropol region to determine the productivity of winter wheat cultivated by direct seeding technology, based on phenological observations and NDVI. The work was carried out on the basis of the agro-enterprise JSC "Agrohleboprodukt" for 2018-2020. The predecessors are sunflower, chickpeas, winter wheat varieties (Zustrich (St.), Bagheera and Bagrat). Plant samples were selected according to the generally accepted method. Satellite mapping data of vegetation cover is obtained on the basis of the service "VEGA-Science". It was found that the growth, development and productivity of winter wheat depended on the prevailing weather and climatic conditions. Studies of the dynamics of the average annual indicators showed that precipitation tended to decrease (37.6-14.4 mm), and the temperature and vegetation index NDVI-to increase (9.6-12.3 °C and 0.456-0.491, respectively). The analysis showed the absence of a reliable level of significance of the combined application of these factors for predicting the productivity of winter wheat. The terms of sowing the crop were determined by external conditions and shifted to a later period. The largest average linear deviation of the indicator was revealed in 2020 (6.4444). On average, the variation of seedlings for different varieties and predecessors was 9 % (the lowest for chickpeas – 7.5 %). Seedlings of grain crops appeared 19-20 days after sowing. The coefficient of variation showed a high heterogeneity of the phenological index for all phases, except for tillering (8.6-9.0 %). The average density of plant seedlings was 379 pcs./m2. The coefficient of variation of the indicator is uniform for all varieties and precursors (3.65 %). A decrease in plant density was observed from the germination phase to earing and for all the predecessors (the largest for the Zustrich variety – 7.3 % and 10.2 % for sunflower and chickpeas, respectively). From 2018 to 2020, the yield of winter wheat when sowing for sunflower was 301-450 t/ha, for chickpeas – 326-468 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat growth, development, and productivity depended on weather and climatic conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
prevailing weather and climatic conditionse0
Outcome
growth, development and productivitye0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the growth, development and productivity of winter wheat depended on the prevailing weather and climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–704 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual precipitation tended to decrease from 37.6 to 14.4 mm.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
precipitatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
37.6-14.4 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“precipitation tended to decrease (37.6-14.4 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature increased from 9.6 to 12.3 °C.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
temperaturee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.6-12.3 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the temperature and vegetation index NDVI-to increase (9.6-12.3 °C and 0.456-0.491, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI increased from 0.456 to 0.491.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
vegetation index NDVIe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.456-0.491e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the temperature and vegetation index NDVI-to increase (9.6-12.3 °C and 0.456-0.491, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–925 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined factors did not reliably predict winter wheat productivity.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined application of these factorse0
Outcome
predicting the productivity of winter wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“absence of a reliable level of significance of the combined application of these factors for predicting the productivity of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing shifted later in response to external conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
external conditionse0
Outcome
terms of sowing the crope0
Direction
shifted to a later periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The terms of sowing the crop were determined by external conditions and shifted to a later period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest average linear deviation of the indicator occurred in 2020 and was 6.4444.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
average linear deviation of the indicatore0
Direction
largeste0
Value
6.4444e0
Qualifier
in 2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The largest average linear deviation of the indicator was revealed in 2020 (6.4444)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling variation across varieties and predecessors averaged 9%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
variation of seedlingse0
Value
9 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“On average, the variation of seedlings for different varieties and predecessors was 9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling variation was lowest after chickpeas, at 7.5%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
variation of seedlingse1
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.5 %e0
Comparator
chickpease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest for chickpeas – 7.5 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1394 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, the variation of seedlings for different varieties and predecessors was 9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain crop seedlings appeared 19–20 days after sowing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Seedlings of grain crops appearede0
Value
19-20 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedlings of grain crops appeared 19-20 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenological indexes were highly heterogeneous across phases except tillering, whose coefficient of variation was 8.6–9.0%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Outcome
heterogeneity of the phenological index for all phasese0
Value
8.6-9.0 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“a high heterogeneity of the phenological index for all phases, except for tillering (8.6-9.0 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seedling density was 379 plants per square meter.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
density of plant seedlingse0
Value
379 pcs./m2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average density of plant seedlings was 379 pcs./m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling density variation was uniform across varieties and predecessors at 3.65%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
coefficient of variation of the indicatore0
Value
3.65 %e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The coefficient of variation of the indicator is uniform for all varieties and precursors (3.65 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density decreased from germination to earing across all predecessors.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
germination phase to earinge0
Outcome
plant densitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“A decrease in plant density was observed from the germination phase to earing and for all the predecessors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest density loss for Zustrich after sunflower was 7.3%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zustrich varietye0
Outcome
plant densitye1
Direction
largeste0
Value
7.3 %e0
Comparator
sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the largest for the Zustrich variety – 7.3 % and 10.2 % for sunflower and chickpeas, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1950 · show in text ↑
e1

“A decrease in plant density was observed from the germination phase to earing and for all the predecessors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest density loss for Zustrich after chickpeas was 10.2%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zustrich varietye0
Outcome
plant densitye1
Direction
largeste0
Value
10.2 %e0
Comparator
chickpease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“the largest for the Zustrich variety – 7.3 % and 10.2 % for sunflower and chickpeas, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1853–1950 · show in text ↑
e1

“A decrease in plant density was observed from the germination phase to earing and for all the predecessors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields after sunflower ranged from 301 to 450 t/ha over 2018–2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield of winter wheate0
Value
301-450 t/hae0
Comparator
sunflowere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“From 2018 to 2020, the yield of winter wheat when sowing for sunflower was 301-450 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yields after chickpeas ranged from 326 to 468 t/ha over 2018–2020.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
yield of winter wheate1
Value
326-468 t/hae0
Comparator
chickpease0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“for chickpeas – 326-468 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2070 · show in text ↑
e1

“From 2018 to 2020, the yield of winter wheat when sowing for sunflower was 301-450 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2040 · show in text ↑