Paper · 2021 · International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

Effect of Irrigation on Cracking of Pomegranate Fruits (French Variety)

Rida DRAIE; Ali ABORAS

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fruit cracking is one of the most important problems faced by pomegranates, which cause great damage to the crop, amounting to more than 60%. The French pomegranate variety is one of the varieties cultivated in northern Syria, which is highly vulnerable to this problem. The research was carried out in the 2018-2019 agricultural season in a field planted with pomegranate trees at the age of 10 years and dimensions 4x4 m, to study the effect of irrigation in reducing fruit cracking. The experiment was conducted according to a complete randomized block design. The experiment included three irrigation treatments: irrigation once after the beginning of flowering, irrigation twice after the beginning of flowering and after the completion of the fruit contract, and irrigation for three times after the beginning of flowering, after the completion of the fruit contract and after the beginning of the fruit discoloration, in addition to the treatment of the control without irrigation. The results showed high sensitivity of the French pomegranate variety to the fruit cracking (73.96%). All irrigation treatments outperformed the control treatment in most of the studied characteristics (early flowering and ripening time, enhancing the percentage of fruit-set, improving the quality of fruits, increasing the productivity). The rise in the number of irrigation times reduced the percentage of fruit cracking compared to the control, while the percentage of cracking of fruits reached 34.06%, 27.37%, 20.24%, in the treatment of irrigation once, twice, and three times, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The French pomegranate variety had 73.96% fruit cracking.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Material
French pomegranate varietye0
Outcome
fruit crackinge0
Value
73.96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high sensitivity of the French pomegranate variety to the fruit cracking (73.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments advanced flowering and ripening relative to the control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
early flowering and ripening timee0
Direction
earlye0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All irrigation treatments outperformed the control treatment in most of the studied characteristics (early flowering and ripening time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments improved fruit set relative to the control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of fruit-sete0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All irrigation treatments outperformed the control treatment in most of the studied characteristics (early flowering and ripening time, enhancing the percentage of fruit-set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments improved fruit quality relative to the control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
quality of fruitse0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All irrigation treatments outperformed the control treatment in most of the studied characteristics (early flowering and ripening time, enhancing the percentage of fruit-set, improving the quality of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation treatments increased productivity relative to the control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All irrigation treatments outperformed the control treatment in most of the studied characteristics (early flowering and ripening time, enhancing the percentage of fruit-set, improving the quality of fruits, increasing the productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One irrigation reduced fruit cracking versus the control, reaching 34.06%.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
irrigation oncee0
Outcome
percentage of fruit crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.06%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rise in the number of irrigation times reduced the percentage of fruit cracking compared to the control, while the percentage of cracking of fruits reached 34.06%, 27.37%, 20.24%, in the treatment of irrigation once, twice, and three times, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations reduced fruit cracking versus the control, reaching 27.37%.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
twicee0
Outcome
percentage of fruit crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27.37%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rise in the number of irrigation times reduced the percentage of fruit cracking compared to the control, while the percentage of cracking of fruits reached 34.06%, 27.37%, 20.24%, in the treatment of irrigation once, twice, and three times, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations reduced fruit cracking versus the control, reaching 20.24%.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
three timese0
Outcome
percentage of fruit crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.24%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rise in the number of irrigation times reduced the percentage of fruit cracking compared to the control, while the percentage of cracking of fruits reached 34.06%, 27.37%, 20.24%, in the treatment of irrigation once, twice, and three times, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pomegranate Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–54 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.