Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Technical and Fumigation Time Effects on Shallot Storage Quality

A B N Aini; Karseno

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Storage involves management after harvest which plays an important role in the quality control of shallots. Shallot farmers also store using the traditional methods of fumigation, e.g smoke, which is used in liquid smoke processing. This research aims to determine the effect of smoking during storage on the physical and sensory characteristics of shallots. The random nature of the block had two factors: smoking (traditional smoking, spraying, dipping methods) and smoking time (1, 2, and 3 hours respectively). The measured variables include weight loss, moisture content, damage and sensory characteristics (texture, flavour). Furthermore, tests were conducted every week for 4 weeks without fumigation according to controls. The results showed that fluid smoke decreases weight loss, moisture content, and lowers the risk of damage using the immersion process. The consistency of shallots can be preserved for up to four weeks by soaking in liquid smoke for 2 hours. There was a weight loss of 4.6%, damage of 1.17% and moisture content of 82.5%. Smokeless shallots also had a weight loss of 33%, damage of 9.17% and humidity 87.29%. Therefore, soaking shallots for 2 hours in liquid smoke helps to retain their physical and chemical properties without changing their sensory characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid smoke immersion reduced shallot weight loss.

Treatment
fluid smokee0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluid smoke decreases weight loss, moisture content, and lowers the risk of damage using the immersion process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid smoke immersion reduced shallot moisture content.

Treatment
fluid smokee0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluid smoke decreases weight loss, moisture content, and lowers the risk of damage using the immersion process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid smoke immersion reduced shallot risk of damage.

Treatment
fluid smokee0
Outcome
risk of damagee0
Direction
lowerse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fluid smoke decreases weight loss, moisture content, and lowers the risk of damage using the immersion process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Shallot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-hour liquid smoke soaking preserved shallot consistency for four weeks.

Treatment
soaking in liquid smoke for 2 hourse0
Outcome
consistency of shallotse0
Direction
preservede0
Value
up to four weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The consistency of shallots can be preserved for up to four weeks by soaking in liquid smoke for 2 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smoked shallots had 4.6% weight loss.

Outcome
weight losse0
Value
4.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a weight loss of 4.6%, damage of 1.17% and moisture content of 82.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“physical and sensory characteristics of shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smoked shallots had 1.17% damage.

Outcome
damagee0
Value
1.17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a weight loss of 4.6%, damage of 1.17% and moisture content of 82.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“physical and sensory characteristics of shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smoked shallots had 82.5% moisture content.

Outcome
moisture contente0
Value
82.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a weight loss of 4.6%, damage of 1.17% and moisture content of 82.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“physical and sensory characteristics of shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smokeless shallots had 33% weight loss.

Outcome
weight losse0
Value
33%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Smokeless shallots also had a weight loss of 33%, damage of 9.17% and humidity 87.29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smokeless shallots had 9.17% damage.

Outcome
damagee0
Value
9.17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Smokeless shallots also had a weight loss of 33%, damage of 9.17% and humidity 87.29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smokeless shallots had 87.29% humidity.

Outcome
humiditye0
Value
87.29%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Smokeless shallots also had a weight loss of 33%, damage of 9.17% and humidity 87.29%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-hour liquid smoke soaking retained physical and chemical properties without changing sensory properties.

Treatment
soaking shallots for 2 hours in liquid smokee0
Outcome
physical and chemical propertiese0
Direction
retaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking shallots for 2 hours in liquid smoke helps to retain their physical and chemical properties without changing their sensory characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-hour liquid smoke soaking did not change sensory characteristics.

Treatment
soaking shallots for 2 hours in liquid smokee0
Outcome
sensory characteristicse0
Direction
without changinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking shallots for 2 hours in liquid smoke helps to retain their physical and chemical properties without changing their sensory characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1306 · show in text ↑

application · quality: general · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.