Paper · 2021 · Land Degradation and Development

Biochemical constituents indicate carbon mineralization under a long‐term integrated nutrient‐supplied Typic Kandiustalf

Dornal Vijaya Kumar Prashanth; Rangaiah Krishnamurthy; Chitranjan Kumar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the long‐term impact of integrated nutrient management to study the influence of fertilizer and manure on different biochemical constituents and carbon mineralization of roots and stubble of finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.) at the Experimental Farm, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India. The farm continuously received uniform treatments for 40‐years during 1978–2018 under a groundnut + finger millet cropping system. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and ash contents for roots and stubble were recorded higher with the treatment T 5 [farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha −1 + 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)] while the control treatment showed their lowest values. The treatment T 5 caused a higher cumulative rate of CO 2 evolution from roots (49.68 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) and stubble (58.48 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) at the 98th day of incubation following a sigmoid curve pattern for the carbon mineralization. The correlation was highly significant between the rate of decomposition and cellulose content for roots (r = 0.892 ** ) and stubble (r = 0.947**). Unlikely, the correlation was negatively significant between the decomposition rate and the lignin content in roots (r = −0.745 * ) and stubble (r = −0.720 * ). We conclude that the combined application of FYM at 10 t ha −1 and 100% RDF is the most efficient treatment to increase saccharification, reduce lignification, and sequester a higher rate of carbon mineralization capable of preserving the soil organic carbon (SOC) and facilitating alluviation of more resistant carbon in a Typic Kandiustalf soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave higher cellulose, hemicellulose and ash in finger millet roots and stubble than the control.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
roots and stubblee0
Treatment
T 5 [farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha −1 + 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)]e0
Outcome
Cellulose, hemicellulose, and ash contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cellulose, hemicellulose, and ash contents for roots and stubble were recorded higher with the treatment T 5 [farmyard manure (FYM) at 10 t ha −1 + 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF)] while the control treatment showed their lowest values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased cumulative CO2 evolution from roots to 49.68 mg CO2 g−1 C at day 98.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
T 5e0
Outcome
cumulative rate of CO 2 evolution from rootse0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.68 mg CO 2 g ‐1 Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T 5 caused a higher cumulative rate of CO 2 evolution from roots (49.68 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) and stubble (58.48 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) at the 98th day of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 increased cumulative CO2 evolution from stubble to 58.48 mg CO2 g−1 C at day 98.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
stubblee0
Treatment
T 5e0
Outcome
cumulative rate of CO 2 evolution from rootse0
Direction
highere0
Value
58.48 mg CO 2 g ‐1 Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T 5 caused a higher cumulative rate of CO 2 evolution from roots (49.68 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) and stubble (58.48 mg CO 2 g ‐1 C) at the 98th day of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root decomposition rate correlated positively with cellulose content.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
rate of decompositione0
Value
r = 0.892 **e0

Not reportedCompoundDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation was highly significant between the rate of decomposition and cellulose content for roots (r = 0.892 ** )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble decomposition rate correlated positively with cellulose content.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
stubblee0
Outcome
rate of decompositione0
Value
r = 0.947**e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation was highly significant between the rate of decomposition and cellulose content for roots (r = 0.892 ** ) and stubble (r = 0.947**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root decomposition rate correlated negatively with lignin content.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
decomposition ratee0
Direction
negativelye0
Value
r = −0.745 *e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the correlation was negatively significant between the decomposition rate and the lignin content in roots (r = −0.745 * )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble decomposition rate correlated negatively with lignin content.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Organ / stage
stubblee0
Outcome
decomposition ratee0
Direction
negativelye0
Value
r = −0.720 *e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the correlation was negatively significant between the decomposition rate and the lignin content in roots (r = −0.745 * ) and stubble (r = −0.720 * )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged combined FYM and RDF most efficient for saccharification, reduced lignification and carbon mineralization.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
combined application of FYM at 10 t ha −1 and 100% RDFe0
Outcome
increase saccharification, reduce lignification, and sequester a higher rate of carbon mineralizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of FYM at 10 t ha −1 and 100% RDF is the most efficient treatment to increase saccharification, reduce lignification, and sequester a higher rate of carbon mineralization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1466 · show in text ↑
e1

“finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–252 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.