Abstract
A field experiment on “Long term effect of integrated nutrient management on finger millet (Eleusine coracana G.) growth and yield was recorded at AICRPDA, GKVK, UAS, Bengaluru, during kharif 2018 with 8 treatments, replicated thrice laid out in RCBD. The results of the field experiment revealed that growth and yield parameters of finger millet such as plant height (96.53 cm), number of tillers per hill (7.60), number of ear heads per hill (7.37), number of fingers per ear head (6.61), test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF. The grain (20.96 q ha-1) and straw (25.40 q ha-1) yield was found to be higher with the application of 10 tonnes FYM ha-1 and 100% RDF. This clearly indicated that application of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients increases growth and yield of finger millet as compare to inorganic only.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher plant height of 96.53 cm.
- Taxon
- Finger Millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 96.53 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height (96.53 cm), number of tillers per hill (7.60), number of ear heads per hill (7.37), number of fingers per ear head (6.61), test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher tillers per hill of 7.60.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- number of tillers per hille0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.60e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of tillers per hill (7.60), number of ear heads per hill (7.37), number of fingers per ear head (6.61), test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher ear heads per hill of 7.37.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- number of ear heads per hille0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.37e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of ear heads per hill (7.37), number of fingers per ear head (6.61), test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher fingers per ear head of 6.61.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- number of fingers per ear heade0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6.61e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of fingers per ear head (6.61), test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher test weight of 3.56 g.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- test weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.56 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“test weight (3.56 g) and total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher total dry matter production of 82.67g per hill.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- total dry mater productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 82.67g per hille0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total dry mater production (82.67g per hill) were higher with the application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + 100% RDF”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher grain yield of 20.96 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 10 tonnes FYM ha-1 and 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 20.96 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain (20.96 q ha-1) and straw (25.40 q ha-1) yield was found to be higher with the application of 10 tonnes FYM ha-1 and 100% RDF.”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus RDF gave higher straw yield of 25.40 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 10 tonnes FYM ha-1 and 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- strawe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 25.40 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain (20.96 q ha-1) and straw (25.40 q ha-1) yield was found to be higher with the application of 10 tonnes FYM ha-1 and 100% RDF.”
t0“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana G.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic and inorganic nutrient sources increased finger millet growth and yield compared with inorganic sources alone.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- organic and inorganic sources of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Comparator
- inorganic onlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients increases growth and yield of finger millet as compare to inorganic only”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
39 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.