Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions

Joseph Nwafor Akanwe Asiwe; Mzamani Knowledge Nkuna; Peter P. Motavalli

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop yields are declined due to low soil fertility, insufficient soil water availability and poorly managed cropping systems in Limpopo province of South Africa. Phosphorus (P) is a major essential nutrient element required by crops for enhanced growth and development. Interactions between different rates of P fertilization and strip intercropping system have not been studied in detail under rainfed conditions in semi-arid region of Limpopo province. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the performance of four cowpea varieties at four levels (0, 15, 30, 45 kg P ha-1) of P fertilization in a cowpea-maize intercropping system in a split-split plot design during two seasons. Significant interactions were obtained between variety and phosphorus application as well as variety and cropping system for 90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yield in both seasons. P levels significantly influenced and enhanced grain yield, land equivalent ratio, profit and benefit cost ratio achieved. PAN311 and TVu13464 matured earlier across P levels and they were selected promising cowpea varieties based on their early maturity and high yield. Land equivalent ratio values were greater than 1.0, which indicated performance and advantage of an intercropping system over monocropping system in land utilisation. The optimum P level for cowpea-maize strip intercropping was at 30 kg P ha-1 based on yield and financial return. The results showed that P application enhanced the productivity of the cowpea varieties in cowpea-maize strip intercropping in the semi-arid environment of Limpopo province. © 2021 Friends Science Publishers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and phosphorus application interact significantly for 90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yield of cowpea.

Treatment
phosphorus applicatione1
Outcome
90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yielde1
Setting
both seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Significant interactions were obtained between variety and phosphorus application as well as variety and cropping system for 90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and cropping system interact significantly for 90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yield of cowpea.

Treatment
cropping systeme1
Outcome
90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yielde1
Setting
both seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Significant interactions were obtained between variety and phosphorus application as well as variety and cropping system for 90% physiological maturity, root mass and grain yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P levels significantly enhanced grain yield and land equivalent ratio of cowpea.

Treatment
P levelse2
Outcome
grain yield, land equivalent ratioe2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“P levels significantly influenced and enhanced grain yield, land equivalent ratio, profit and benefit cost ratio achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P levels significantly enhanced profit and benefit cost ratio of cowpea.

Treatment
P levelse2
Outcome
profit and benefit cost ratioe2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“P levels significantly influenced and enhanced grain yield, land equivalent ratio, profit and benefit cost ratio achieved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAN311 and TVu13464 matured earlier than other cowpea varieties across P levels.

Material
PAN311 and TVu13464e3
Outcome
maturitye3
Direction
matured earliere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“PAN311 and TVu13464 matured earlier across P levels and they were selected promising cowpea varieties based on their early maturity and high yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PAN311 and TVu13464 are selected as promising cowpea varieties for early maturity and high yield.

Material
PAN311 and TVu13464e3
Outcome
selected promising cowpea varietiese3
Qualifier
based on their early maturity and high yielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“PAN311 and TVu13464 matured earlier across P levels and they were selected promising cowpea varieties based on their early maturity and high yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea-maize strip intercropping had a land equivalent ratio greater than 1.0, above monocropping.

Treatment
an intercropping systeme4
Outcome
Land equivalent ratioe4
Direction
greater thane4
Value
1.0e4
Comparator
monocropping systeme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Land equivalent ratio values were greater than 1.0, which indicated performance and advantage of an intercropping system over monocropping system in land utilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum P level for cowpea-maize strip intercropping is 30 kg P ha-1 based on yield and financial return.

Outcome
optimum P levele5
Value
30 kg P ha-1e5
Qualifier
based on yield and financial returne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The optimum P level for cowpea-maize strip intercropping was at 30 kg P ha-1 based on yield and financial return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Phosphorus Fertilization in Cowpea-Maize Strip Intercropping under Rainfed Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.