Paper · 2021 · Plants

Shape Matters: Plant Architecture Affects Chemical Uniformity in Large-Size Medical Cannabis Plants

Nadav Danziger; Nirit Bernstein

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Since plant organs sense their environment locally, gradients of micro-climates in the plant shoot may induce spatial variability in the physiological state of the plant tissue and hence secondary metabolism. Therefore, plant architecture, which affects micro-climate in the shoot, may considerably affect the uniformity of cannabinoids in the Cannabis sativa plant, which has significant pharmaceutical and economic importance. Variability of micro-climates in plant shoots intensifies with the increase in plant size, largely due to an increase in inter-shoot shading. In this study, we therefore focused on the interplay between shoot architecture and the cannabinoid profile in large cannabis plants, ~2.5 m in height, with the goal to harness architecture modulation for the standardization of cannabinoid concentrations in large plants. We hypothesized that (i) a gradient of light intensity along the plants is accompanied by changes to the cannabinoid profile, and (ii) manipulations of plant architecture that increase light penetration to the plant increase cannabinoid uniformity and yield biomass. To test these hypotheses, we investigated effects of eight plant architecture manipulation treatments involving branch removals, defoliation, and pruning on plant morpho-physiology, inflorescence yield, cannabinoid profile, and uniformity. The results revealed that low cannabinoid concentrations in inflorescences at the bottom of the plants correlate with low light penetration, and that increasing light penetration by defoliation or removal of bottom branches and leaves increases cannabinoid concentrations locally and thereby through spatial uniformity, thus supporting the hypotheses. Taken together, the results reveal that shoot architectural modulation can be utilized to increase cannabinoid standardization in large cannabis plants, and that the cannabinoid profile in an inflorescence is an outcome of exogenous and endogenous factors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low cannabinoid concentrations in lower inflorescences correlated with low light penetration.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae1
Organ / stage
inflorescences at the bottom of the plantse0
Outcome
cannabinoid concentrationse0
Direction
lowe0
Setting
low light penetratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low cannabinoid concentrations in inflorescences at the bottom of the plants correlate with low light penetration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1489 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cannabis sativa plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation increased local cannabinoid concentrations and spatial uniformity by increasing light penetration.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae1
Treatment
defoliatione0
Outcome
cannabinoid concentrations locally and thereby through spatial uniformitye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing light penetration by defoliation or removal of bottom branches and leaves increases cannabinoid concentrations locally and thereby through spatial uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cannabis sativa plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of bottom branches and leaves increased local cannabinoid concentrations and spatial uniformity.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae1
Treatment
removal of bottom branches and leavese0
Outcome
cannabinoid concentrations locally and thereby through spatial uniformitye0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing light penetration by defoliation or removal of bottom branches and leaves increases cannabinoid concentrations locally and thereby through spatial uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cannabis sativa plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–365 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that shoot architecture can be modulated to standardize cannabinoid concentrations.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae1
Treatment
shoot architectural modulatione0
Outcome
increase cannabinoid standardizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot architectural modulation can be utilized to increase cannabinoid standardization in large cannabis plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1853 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cannabis sativa plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–365 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors interpreted the inflorescence cannabinoid profile as an outcome of exogenous and endogenous factors.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativae1
Outcome
cannabinoid profile in an inflorescencee0
Qualifier
exogenous and endogenous factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cannabinoid profile in an inflorescence is an outcome of exogenous and endogenous factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1957 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cannabis sativa plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–365 · show in text ↑

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.