Abstract
This study, aimed to evaluate the influence of alternative products on the oviposition of Leucoptera coffeella. The tests were performed in a lab on seedlings of coffee IAPAR-59 which were eight months of age and had at least four pairs of leaves. The treatments were: control without application, distilled water, propolis extract, lime sulphur, silicate clay, neem oil, pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic, kaolin, and kaolin + neem oil. The treatments were sprayed with a pressure of 2 bar. We evaluated the effect of pesticides on L. coffeella oviposition on treated leaves. The evaluation results of the test oviposition leaf miner no choice were subjected to analysis of variance, using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons at 0.5 %. The propolis extract, neem oil, neem oil + kaolin, and pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of L. coffeella. Thus, although still to be evaluated under field conditions, it is possible that the application of these products can reduce coffee plant colonization by L. coffeella, thus avoiding high pest populations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Propolis extract repelled oviposition of Leucoptera coffeella on sprayed coffee seedlings in the lab relative to the untreated control.
- Treatment
- propolis extracte2
- Interactor
- L. coffeella
Leucoptera coffeellae2pest - Outcome
- oviposition of L. coffeellae2
- Direction
- repellede2
- Comparator
- control without applicatione1
- Setting
- labe0
CoffeaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tests were performed in a lab on seedlings of coffee IAPAR-59”
e1“The treatments were: control without application”
e2“The propolis extract, neem oil, neem oil + kaolin, and pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of L. coffeella”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil repelled oviposition of Leucoptera coffeella on sprayed coffee seedlings in the lab relative to the untreated control.
- Treatment
- neem oile2
- Interactor
- L. coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae2pest
- Outcome
- oviposition of L. coffeellae2
- Direction
- repellede2
- Comparator
- control without applicatione1
- Setting
- labe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tests were performed in a lab on seedlings of coffee IAPAR-59”
e1“The treatments were: control without application”
e2“The propolis extract, neem oil, neem oil + kaolin, and pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of L. coffeella”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil plus kaolin repelled oviposition of Leucoptera coffeella on sprayed coffee seedlings in the lab relative to the untreated control.
- Treatment
- neem oil + kaoline2
- Interactor
- L. coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae2pest
- Outcome
- oviposition of L. coffeellae2
- Direction
- repellede2
- Comparator
- control without applicatione1
- Setting
- labe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tests were performed in a lab on seedlings of coffee IAPAR-59”
e1“The treatments were: control without application”
e2“The propolis extract, neem oil, neem oil + kaolin, and pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of L. coffeella”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of Leucoptera coffeella on sprayed coffee seedlings in the lab relative to the untreated control.
- Treatment
- pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlice2
- Interactor
- L. coffeellaLeucoptera coffeellae2pest
- Outcome
- oviposition of L. coffeellae2
- Direction
- repellede2
- Comparator
- control without applicatione1
- Setting
- labe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tests were performed in a lab on seedlings of coffee IAPAR-59”
e1“The treatments were: control without application”
e2“The propolis extract, neem oil, neem oil + kaolin, and pyroligneous extract with pepper and garlic repelled oviposition of L. coffeella”
The same questions in other papers
propolis extract · Leucoptera coffeella · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
kaolin · Leucoptera coffeella · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Allium sativum · Leucoptera coffeella · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
botanical · Leucoptera coffeella · Coffea (coffee)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.