Paper · 2021 · Horticulturae

Evaluation of Blossom Thinning Spray Timing Strategies in Apple

W. Chester Allen; Tom Kon; Sherif M. Sherif

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the eastern USA and several other apple-growing regions, apple blossom thinning using lime sulfur is a relatively new crop load management strategy. This study sought to evaluate how application timing of lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning sprays would influence thinning efficacy and crop safety of ‘Gala’ apples. This project occurred at two locations in the USA, Winchester, Virginia, and Mills River, North Carolina, during the 2019 growing season. Two main timing strategies were assessed: (1) model-guided sprays with the pollen tube growth model (PTGM), (2) fixed spray intervals with the first spray applied at a specified percentage of open bloom (20% vs. 80%), and the second spray applied at a reapplication interval (48 h vs. 72 h). Model-guided and 20% open bloom + 48-h treatments reduced fruit set and increased fruit weight, diameter, and length at both sites. Treatments with a delayed first spray at 80% open bloom or a more extended second reapplication of 72 h were generally ineffective. There was no conclusive evidence that lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning spray timing influenced russet incidence/severity or leaf phytotoxicity. This study demonstrated that effective and safe blossom thinning can be obtained from applying two sprays at 20% open bloom and 48 h thereafter or using the PTGM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model-guided spray timing reduced fruit set at both sites.

Material
‘Gala’e1
Treatment
Model-guidede0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at both sitese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Model-guided and 20% open bloom + 48-h treatments reduced fruit set and increased fruit weight, diameter, and length at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20% open bloom plus 48-hour schedule reduced fruit set at both sites.

Material
‘Gala’e1
Treatment
20% open bloom + 48-he0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Model-guided and 20% open bloom + 48-h treatments reduced fruit set and increased fruit weight, diameter, and length at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model-guided timing increased fruit weight, diameter and length at both sites.

Treatment
Model-guidede0
Outcome
fruit weight, diameter, and lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Model-guided and 20% open bloom + 48-h treatments reduced fruit set and increased fruit weight, diameter, and length at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% open bloom plus 48-hour schedule increased fruit weight, diameter and length at both sites.

Treatment
20% open bloom + 48-he0
Outcome
fruit weight, diameter, and lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Model-guided and 20% open bloom + 48-h treatments reduced fruit set and increased fruit weight, diameter, and length at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the first spray to 80% open bloom was generally ineffective.

Treatment
a delayed first spray at 80% open bloome0
Outcome
generally ineffectivee0
Direction
generally ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with a delayed first spray at 80% open bloom or a more extended second reapplication of 72 h were generally ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 72-hour second-spray interval was generally ineffective.

Treatment
a more extended second reapplication of 72 he0
Outcome
generally ineffectivee0
Direction
generally ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with a delayed first spray at 80% open bloom or a more extended second reapplication of 72 h were generally ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evidence was inconclusive for an effect of spray timing on russet incidence or severity.

Treatment
lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning spray timinge0
Outcome
russet incidence/severitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no conclusive evidence that lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning spray timing influenced russet incidence/severity or leaf phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evidence was inconclusive for an effect of spray timing on leaf phytotoxicity.

Treatment
lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning spray timinge0
Outcome
leaf phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no conclusive evidence that lime sulfur + stylet oil blossom thinning spray timing influenced russet incidence/severity or leaf phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend two sprays at 20% open bloom and 48 hours later for effective and safe thinning.

Outcome
applying two sprays at 20% open bloom and 48 h thereaftere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective and safe blossom thinning can be obtained from applying two sprays at 20% open bloom and 48 h thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1315 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors also recommend PTGM-guided spray timing for effective and safe thinning.

Outcome
using the PTGMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective and safe blossom thinning can be obtained from applying two sprays at 20% open bloom and 48 h thereafter or using the PTGM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Gala’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–323 · show in text ↑