Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Continuous Practice of Conservation Agriculture for 3–5 Years in Intensive Rice-Based Cropping Patterns Reduces Soil Weed Seedbank

Mohammad Mobarak Hossain; Mahfuza Begum; Abul Hashem; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

When farmers first shift from conventional tillage (CT) to conservation agriculture (CA) practices, the control of weeds may be more difficult, due to the absence of tillage. However, continuous CA, over several years, may alter the weed seedbank. The nature of the weed seedbank changes over time, in intensively cropped rice-based rotations that are typical of the Eastern Gangetic Plain, are not well understood. Two on-farm CA experiments were sampled (in Beluapara after 3 years and Digram after 5 years) in Bangladesh for the effects of strip planting (SP) and bed planting (BP) at both the sites, plus no-tillage (NT) in Beluapara, and increased retention of the residue of previous crops (20% vs. 50%). The conventional tillage (CT) and 20% residue was the control treatment. The weed seedbank in 0–15 cm soil was quantified by assessing the emergence of weeds from soils collected from the field after irrigation, (Boro) rice in Digram and wheat in Beluapara, and they were allowed to emerge in trays in a shade-house experiment. The year-round count of emerged weeds at both the locations revealed the fewest number of weed species (especially broadleaf weeds), and the lowest weed density and biomass in SP, followed by CT, BP, and NT, with 50% crop residue mulch. Relative to CT, the SP, BP, and NT produced relatively more perennials weeds, as follows: Alternanthera denticulata ((R.) Brown.), Cyperus rotundus (L.), Dentella repens (L.), Jussia deccurence (Walt.), Leersia hexandra (L.), and Solanum torvum (Sw.), which was the opposite of CT that was enriched with the following annual weeds: Cyperus iria (L.), Digitaria sanguinalis (L.), Euphorbia parviflora (L.), Fimbristylis miliacea (L.), Lindernia antipoda (L.), L. hyssopifolia (L.), and Monochoria hastata (L.). The soil weed seed bank reduced by 13% in SP, while it increased by 19% and 76% in BP and NT, respectively, compared with CT. The species diversity reduced in SP and NT, by 24% and 11%, respectively, but increased by 2% in BP. In 50% residue, the soil weed seed bank and species diversity reduced by 16% and 14%, respectively, relative to that of 20% residue. The continuous practice of CA, for 3 or more years, in two rice-based crop rotations, decreased the size of the weed seedbank, but increased the relative proliferation of specific perennial weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip planting with 50% residue had the fewest emerged weed species, especially broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
SPe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weed speciese0
Direction
feweste0
Qualifier
50% crop residue mulche0
Comparator
CT, BP, and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The year-round count of emerged weeds at both the locations revealed the fewest number of weed species (especially broadleaf weeds), and the lowest weed density and biomass in SP, followed by CT, BP, and NT, with 50% crop residue mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip planting with 50% residue had the lowest emerged weed density and biomass.

Treatment
SPe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
50% crop residue mulche0
Comparator
CT, BP, and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The year-round count of emerged weeds at both the locations revealed the fewest number of weed species (especially broadleaf weeds), and the lowest weed density and biomass in SP, followed by CT, BP, and NT, with 50% crop residue mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip planting, bed planting and no-tillage yielded relatively more perennial weeds than conventional tillage.

Treatment
SP, BP, and NTe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
perennials weedse0
Direction
relatively moree0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative to CT, the SP, BP, and NT produced relatively more perennials weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1352 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage was enriched with annual weeds.

Treatment
CTe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
annual weedse0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“CT that was enriched with the following annual weeds: Cyperus iria (L.), Digitaria sanguinalis (L.), Euphorbia parviflora (L.), Fimbristylis miliacea (L.), Lindernia antipoda (L.), L. hyssopifolia (L.), and Monochoria hastata (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip planting reduced the soil weed seed bank by 13% versus conventional tillage.

Treatment
SPe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
soil weed seed banke0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil weed seed bank reduced by 13% in SP, while it increased by 19% and 76% in BP and NT, respectively, compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting increased the soil weed seed bank by 19% versus conventional tillage.

Treatment
BPe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
soil weed seed banke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil weed seed bank reduced by 13% in SP, while it increased by 19% and 76% in BP and NT, respectively, compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased the soil weed seed bank by 76% versus conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
soil weed seed banke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
76%e0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soil weed seed bank reduced by 13% in SP, while it increased by 19% and 76% in BP and NT, respectively, compared with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1786–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip planting reduced weed species diversity by 24%.

Treatment
SPe0
Outcome
species diversitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The species diversity reduced in SP and NT, by 24% and 11%, respectively, but increased by 2% in BP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage reduced weed species diversity by 11%.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
species diversitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The species diversity reduced in SP and NT, by 24% and 11%, respectively, but increased by 2% in BP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting increased weed species diversity by 2%.

Treatment
BPe0
Outcome
species diversitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The species diversity reduced in SP and NT, by 24% and 11%, respectively, but increased by 2% in BP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent residue reduced soil weed seed bank by 16% versus 20% residue.

Treatment
50% residuee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
soil weed seed banke0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
20% residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 50% residue, the soil weed seed bank and species diversity reduced by 16% and 14%, respectively, relative to that of 20% residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent residue reduced weed species diversity by 14% versus 20% residue.

Treatment
50% residuee0
Outcome
species diversitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
20% residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Based Cropping Patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 50% residue, the soil weed seed bank and species diversity reduced by 16% and 14%, respectively, relative to that of 20% residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2144 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

86 papers: 71 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.