Paper · 2019 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of tillage and nutrient management on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) productivity in Alfisols of semi-arid tropical India

J S MISHRA; S S RAO; I K DAS

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India for 3 years (2011-2013). Results revealed that conventional tillage significantly increased growth parameters, viz. leaf area index, SPAD, and plant height as compared to NT, and produced 14% higher grain yield (2.94 Mg/ha) when compared to RT (2.57 Mg/ha) and 58% to NT (1.86 Mg/ha) system. No tillage significantly increased the density of grassy weed Brachiaria reptans (34.50/ m2) as compared to RT (21.83/m2) and CT (26.33/m2). However, the density of Cyperus iria (78.67/m2) and Digera arvensis (17.0/m2) increased significantly in CT. Conventional tillage significantly increased soil moisture content and Azotobacter population at 0-15 cm soil depth compared to NT conditions. Conventional tillage and application of RDF (80:40:40 kg NPK/ha) recorded maximum yield, net returns, B:C ratio and energy productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased leaf area index, SPAD and plant height compared with no tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
leaf area index, SPAD, and plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
NTe1
Setting
Hyderabad, Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage significantly increased growth parameters, viz. leaf area index, SPAD, and plant height as compared to NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave 14% higher grain yield than reduced tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
14%e2
Comparator
RTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage significantly increased growth parameters, viz. leaf area index, SPAD, and plant height as compared to NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–472 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced 14% higher grain yield (2.94 Mg/ha) when compared to RT (2.57 Mg/ha) and 58% to NT (1.86 Mg/ha) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave 58% higher grain yield than no tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
58%e2
Comparator
NTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage significantly increased growth parameters, viz. leaf area index, SPAD, and plant height as compared to NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–472 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced 14% higher grain yield (2.94 Mg/ha) when compared to RT (2.57 Mg/ha) and 58% to NT (1.86 Mg/ha) system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased Brachiaria reptans density compared with reduced tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
No tillagee3
Interactor
Brachiaria reptansUrochloa reptanse3weed
Outcome
densitye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
34.50/m2e3
Qualifier
21.83/m2e3
Comparator
RTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa reptans
Urochloa reptans · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e3

“No tillage significantly increased the density of grassy weed Brachiaria reptans (34.50/ m2) as compared to RT (21.83/m2) and CT (26.33/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased Brachiaria reptans density compared with conventional tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
No tillagee3
Interactor
Brachiaria reptansUrochloa reptanse3weed
Outcome
densitye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
34.50/m2e3
Qualifier
26.33/m2e3
Comparator
CTe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Urochloa reptans
Urochloa reptans · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e3

“No tillage significantly increased the density of grassy weed Brachiaria reptans (34.50/ m2) as compared to RT (21.83/m2) and CT (26.33/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased Cyperus iria density

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
CTe4
Interactor
Cyperus iriaCyperus iriae4weed
Outcome
densitye4
Direction
increasede4
Value
78.67/m2e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus iria
Cyperus iria · InteractorDinesh Valke from Thane, India · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, the density of Cyperus iria (78.67/m2) and Digera arvensis (17.0/m2) increased significantly in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased Digera arvensis density

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
CTe4
Interactor
Digera arvensise4weed
Outcome
densitye4
Direction
increasede4
Value
17.0/m2e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, the density of Cyperus iria (78.67/m2) and Digera arvensis (17.0/m2) increased significantly in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased soil moisture content at 0-15 cm depth compared with no tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee5
Outcome
soil moisture contente5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
NT conditionse5
Setting
0-15 cm soil depthe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e5

“Conventional tillage significantly increased soil moisture content and Azotobacter population at 0-15 cm soil depth compared to NT conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased Azotobacter population at 0-15 cm depth compared with no tillage

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee5
Outcome
Azotobacter populatione5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
NT conditionse5
Setting
0-15 cm soil depthe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e5

“Conventional tillage significantly increased soil moisture content and Azotobacter population at 0-15 cm soil depth compared to NT conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with RDF gave maximum yield, net returns and B:C ratio

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Conventional tillage and application of RDF (80:40:40 kg NPK/ha)e6
Outcome
yield, net returns, B:C ratioe6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conventional tillage and application of RDF (80:40:40 kg NPK/ha) recorded maximum yield, net returns, B:C ratio and energy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with RDF gave maximum energy productivity

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Conventional tillage and application of RDF (80:40:40 kg NPK/ha)e6
Outcome
energy productivitye6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined effects of tillage intensity (conventional-CT, reduced-RT or no tillage-NT) and nutrient management (inorganic and/or organic) on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] production, soil properties, weed dynamics, energy use, and economics were studied on an Alfisols in Hyderabad, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–298 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conventional tillage and application of RDF (80:40:40 kg NPK/ha) recorded maximum yield, net returns, B:C ratio and energy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1119 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.