Paper · 2019

Wild Relatives and Their Role in Building Resistance in Bread Wheat: at a Glance

Sameen Ruqia Imadi; Alvina Gul

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
6
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat is the domesticated form of many of the grasses from Poaceae and tribe Triticeae. These annual and perennial grasses comprising of approximately 325 species also include the diploid ancestors of wheat known as its wild relatives. These relatives exhibit more genetic diversity as compared to their cultivated form, hence are a potent means of allelic enrichment of wheat via intergeneric, interspecific or intraspecific hybridization. Wheat relatives include many grasses like Aegilops, Thinopyrum, Triticum, Elymus, Leymus, Elytrigia, Lophopyrum, Secale, Heteranthelium, Taeniantherum, Haynaldia, and Hordeum from the tribe Hordeae that are distributed across the three gene pools (primary, secondary, and tertiary) based upon their genetic distance attribute. Due to the allelic variation that is present, these relatives have been utilized in wheat research and production for over a century commencing in 1904 with wheat/barley combinations or as early as 1872 if X Triticale is considered. During these many decades via basic, strategic, and applied research efforts genes have been exploited for introgressing resistances/tolerances to several biotic and abiotic stresses of global significance. The trait coverage has increased progressively and currently targets include insect/virus resistance, micronutrients with growing focus on cereal quality parameters towards which these alien resources are contributing new diversity. Wild relative variation is not restricted to bread 396wheats alone and the tetraploid durums are also recipients of their practical benefits for crop yield maximization. Potential of the wild resource also exists for inducing sterility; crucial for hybrid wheat development. In addition, within the strategic research scenario wild species have emerged as a significant base for producing user-friendly wheat genomic genetic stocks for future usage practicality. We in this review have targeted major facets of wild relative utilization for wheat improvement since 1904 and in addition have provided an in-depth overview of the germplasm holdings that global researchers could tap upon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat wild relatives have greater genetic diversity than cultivated wheat.

Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These relatives exhibit more genetic diversity as compared to their cultivated form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild relative genes have been used to introduce resistance or tolerance to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses into wheat.

Outcome
resistances/tolerances to several biotic and abiotic stressese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genes have been exploited for introgressing resistances/tolerances to several biotic and abiotic stresses of global significance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild relatives contribute diversity for insect and virus resistance, micronutrients and cereal quality.

Outcome
insect/virus resistance, micronutrients with growing focus on cereal quality parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“currently targets include insect/virus resistance, micronutrients with growing focus on cereal quality parameters towards which these alien resources are contributing new diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraploid durums also receive practical benefits from wild relative variation for yield maximization.

Taxon
tetraploid durumse0
Outcome
crop yield maximizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the tetraploid durums are also recipients of their practical benefits for crop yield maximization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1609 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild resources have potential to induce sterility for hybrid wheat development.

Outcome
sterilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potential of the wild resource also exists for inducing sterility; crucial for hybrid wheat development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1714 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild species provide a base for wheat genomic genetic stocks.

Outcome
wheat genomic genetic stockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild species have emerged as a significant base for producing user-friendly wheat genomic genetic stocks for future usage practicality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1902 · show in text ↑