Paper · 2021 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Efficacy of some Bio-agents, Chemical Inducers and Fungicides in Controlling Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani

Heba E. Aboelmagd

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root rot diseasecaused byRhizoctonia solani; is one of the most common destructive tomato diseases. Many different agents i.e., biological agents, chemical inducers and fungicides were investigated for their antagonistic effects on growth of R. solani in vitro. The obtained results showed that, maximum inhibitory effect “100%” was obtained by most tested fungicides i.e. Rizolex–T, Maxim-XL and Moncut followed by salicylic acid at 8mM as chemical inducers. Also, Glomus sp and T. viride as bio-agents were most effective treatments against R. solani where they inhibited the growth of R. solani by 67.22 and 64.07%, respectively followed by oxalic acid at 8 mM and K2HPO4 at 15 mM treatments which recorded 59.6 and 44.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, chitosan treatment was the least inhibitive treatment in vitro. Under greenhouse conditions, chitosan was the highest effective treatment in reducing incidence severity of tomato root rot disease as well as increased the assessed vegetative parameters. Moreover, all tested treatments clearly increased the total phenol content and activities of plant defense-related enzymes. As for tomato root anatomy, most treatments increased root diameter of treated tomato plants. Where, T. viride followed by B. subtilis treatments were the best comparing with control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested fungicides Rizolex–T, Maxim-XL and Moncut gave maximum inhibition (100%) of Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.

Treatment
tested fungicidese0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
100%e0
Qualifier
Rizolex–T, Maxim-XL and Moncute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum inhibitory effect “100%” was obtained by most tested fungicides i.e. Rizolex–T, Maxim-XL and Moncut followed by salicylic acid at 8mM as chemical inducers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 8 mM as a chemical inducer followed the top fungicides in inhibiting Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.

Treatment
salicylic acid at 8mMe0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum inhibitory effect “100%” was obtained by most tested fungicides i.e. Rizolex–T, Maxim-XL and Moncut followed by salicylic acid at 8mM as chemical inducers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus sp inhibited the growth of Rhizoctonia solani by 67.22% in vitro.

Treatment
bio-agentse2
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
Glomus spGlomuse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibited the growthe2
Direction
inhibitede2
Value
67.22e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Glomus
Glomus · Second interactorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glomus sp and T. viride as bio-agents were most effective treatments against R. solani where they inhibited the growth of R. solani by 67.22 and 64.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride inhibited the growth of Rhizoctonia solani by 64.07% in vitro.

Treatment
bio-agentse2
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
T. viridee2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
inhibited the growthe2
Direction
inhibitede2
Value
64.07e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glomus sp and T. viride as bio-agents were most effective treatments against R. solani where they inhibited the growth of R. solani by 67.22 and 64.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxalic acid at 8 mM recorded 59.6% inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani growth in vitro.

Treatment
oxalic acid at 8 mMe3
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
inhibited the growthe2
Direction
recordede3
Value
59.6e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glomus sp and T. viride as bio-agents were most effective treatments against R. solani where they inhibited the growth of R. solani by 67.22 and 64.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–631 · show in text ↑
e3

“oxalic acid at 8 mM and K2HPO4 at 15 mM treatments which recorded 59.6 and 44.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2HPO4 at 15 mM recorded 44.1% inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani growth in vitro.

Treatment
K2HPO4 at 15 mMe3
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
inhibited the growthe2
Direction
recordede3
Value
44.1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glomus sp and T. viride as bio-agents were most effective treatments against R. solani where they inhibited the growth of R. solani by 67.22 and 64.07%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–631 · show in text ↑
e3

“oxalic acid at 8 mM and K2HPO4 at 15 mM treatments which recorded 59.6 and 44.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan was the least inhibitive treatment of Rhizoctonia solani in vitro.

Treatment
chitosan treatmente4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
least inhibitivee4
Direction
leaste4
Setting
in vitroe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“chitosan treatment was the least inhibitive treatment in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under greenhouse conditions, chitosan was the most effective treatment in reducing the incidence and severity of tomato root rot.

Treatment
chitosane5
Outcome
incidence severitye5
Direction
reducinge5
Setting
Under greenhouse conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under greenhouse conditions, chitosan was the highest effective treatment in reducing incidence severity of tomato root rot disease as well as increased the assessed vegetative parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased the assessed vegetative parameters of tomato under greenhouse conditions.

Treatment
chitosane5
Outcome
assessed vegetative parameterse5
Direction
increasede5
Setting
greenhouse conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Under greenhouse conditions, chitosan was the highest effective treatment in reducing incidence severity of tomato root rot disease as well as increased the assessed vegetative parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested treatments increased total phenol content and activities of plant defense-related enzymes in tomato.

Treatment
all tested treatmentse6
Outcome
total phenol content and activities of plant defense-related enzymese6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“all tested treatments clearly increased the total phenol content and activities of plant defense-related enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments increased root diameter of treated tomato plants.

Treatment
most treatmentse7
Outcome
root diametere7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“most treatments increased root diameter of treated tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride followed by Bacillus subtilis treatments were the best compared with the control.

Treatment
T. viride followed by B. subtilise7
Interactor
T. viridee7biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
B. subtilise7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
treatments were the beste7
Direction
beste7
Comparator
control treatmente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Root Rot Disease Caused by Rhizoctonia solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–129 · show in text ↑
e7

“T. viride followed by B. subtilis treatments were the best comparing with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1320 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

salicylic acid · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.