Paper · 2017 · Scientific Journal for Damietta Faculty of Science/Scientific Journal for Damietta Faculty of Science

Responses of Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes to Post-Anthesis Water Deficit

Nemat Hassan; Maaty Keshta; Heba Ebeed; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the responses of six oil sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) genotypes namely; Sakha 53, H(A9XRf6), B11, B12, H(A9XRf8) and B20 to drought stress. Plants were subjected to three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought Water regime was started directly post anthesis by withholding water during seed-filling stage until complete maturity of seeds. Moderate and severe drought decreased plant height and stem diameter of all genotypes, except B11 and B20 which recorded non-significant decrease in plant height under moderate drought. On the other hand, non-significant effect was observed in leaf area in all genotypes except B12 and H(A9XRf8) where a significant decrease was recorded only under severe drought. Yield components (head diameter, seed yield, 100 seed weight, seed husk %, seed kernel %, and oil percentage) responded to drought stress differently according to genotypes. Significant decreases were observed in floral head diameter seed yield, oil percentage and protein content in all genotypes except for the non-significant reduction in seed yield and oil content in Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6) under moderate drought Generally, Skha53 was the most drought-tolerant genotype whereas B11, B12 and B20 exhibited the least tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and severe drought decreased plant height and stem diameter of sunflower genotypes relative to adequate water.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Moderate and severe droughte1
Outcome
plant height and stem diametere1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moderate and severe drought decreased plant height and stem diameter of all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area showed a non-significant drought effect in all genotypes except B12 and H(A9XRf8).

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
droughte2
Outcome
leaf areae2
Direction
non-significant effecte2
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-significant effect was observed in leaf area in all genotypes except B12 and H(A9XRf8) where a significant decrease was recorded only under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area of B12 and H(A9XRf8) decreased significantly under severe drought.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Material
B12 and H(A9XRf8)e2
Treatment
severe droughte2
Outcome
leaf areae2
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“non-significant effect was observed in leaf area in all genotypes except B12 and H(A9XRf8) where a significant decrease was recorded only under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral head diameter, seed yield and oil percentage decreased under moderate drought in all genotypes, except for non-significant reductions in some genotypes.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
moderate droughte3
Outcome
floral head diameter seed yield, oil percentagee3
Direction
decreasese3
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significant decreases were observed in floral head diameter seed yield, oil percentage and protein content in all genotypes except for the non-significant reduction in seed yield and oil content in Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6) under moderate drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content decreased significantly under moderate drought in sunflower genotypes.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
moderate droughte3
Outcome
protein contente3
Direction
decreasese3
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significant decreases were observed in floral head diameter seed yield, oil percentage and protein content in all genotypes except for the non-significant reduction in seed yield and oil content in Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6) under moderate drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield and oil content showed a non-significant reduction in Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6) under moderate drought.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Material
Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6)e3
Treatment
moderate droughte3
Outcome
seed yield and oil contente3
Direction
non-significant reductione3
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significant decreases were observed in floral head diameter seed yield, oil percentage and protein content in all genotypes except for the non-significant reduction in seed yield and oil content in Sakha53 and H(A9XRf6) under moderate drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1204 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skha53 was the most drought-tolerant genotype among the six tested.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Material
Skha53e4
Outcome
drought-tolerant genotypee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“Generally, Skha53 was the most drought-tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B11, B12 and B20 exhibited the least drought tolerance.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Material
B11, B12 and B20e5
Outcome
tolerancee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas B11, B12 and B20 exhibited the least tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components responded to drought stress differently among sunflower genotypes.

Taxon
Helianthus annuus LHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
drought stresse6
Outcome
Yield componentse6
Direction
differentlye6
Comparator
adequate (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Six Oil Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“three levels of water: adequate (control), moderate drought and severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–293 · show in text ↑
e6

“Yield components (head diameter, seed yield, 100 seed weight, seed husk %, seed kernel %, and oil percentage) responded to drought stress differently according to genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–960 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

26 papers: 2 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

drought · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

59 papers: 9 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.