Abstract
Abstract Background The relation between the macronutrients P and K seems to be synergistic due to the beneficial effects of the interaction between (P × K) and varies according to the variety used. Therefore, two field experiments were conducted during 2018 and 2019 summer seasons to study the effect of interaction of phosphatic fertilization at 0, 37.5 and 75 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 and potassic fertilization at 0 and 57.6 kg K 2 O ha −1 on the yield and yield components of two mungbean varieties, viz . Kawmy-l and V2010, as well as determining the relationship between the two nutrients interaction. Results The results showed that there were varietal differences in yield and yield components regardless fertilizer application. Either phosphatic or potassic fertilization significantly increased mungbean yield and yield components traits. Significant effects due to the interaction (V × P) were reported on yield component traits in both seasons. Furthermore, the triple interaction (V × P × K) indicates that synergistic effect was reported for the two varieties and was more clearer for V2010 where it needed both of P and K nutrients to out yield the greatest seed yield ha −1 , while Kawmy-1 gave the greatest seed yield ha −1 without K application. Conclusion It could be concluded from this study that mungbean varieties differ in their response to the synergistic interaction effect of P and K and the combination of 75 kg P 2 O 5 + 57.6 kg K 2 O is preferable for V2010 and 75 kg P 2 O 5 alone for Kawmy-1 to produce the greatest yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed in yield and yield components regardless of fertilizer.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- yield and yield componentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e0“there were varietal differences in yield and yield components regardless fertilizer application”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphatic fertilization increased yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- phosphatice1
- Outcome
- yield and yield components traitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e1“Either phosphatic or potassic fertilization significantly increased mungbean yield and yield components traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassic fertilization increased yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- potassice1
- Outcome
- yield and yield components traitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e1“Either phosphatic or potassic fertilization significantly increased mungbean yield and yield components traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety by P interaction significantly affected yield components in both seasons.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- interaction (V × P)e2
- Outcome
- yield component traitse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e2“Significant effects due to the interaction (V × P) were reported on yield component traits in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
V2010 needed both P and K for greatest seed yield.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- V2010e3
- Treatment
- both of P and K nutrientse3
- Outcome
- seed yielde3
- Direction
- greateste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e3“more clearer for V2010 where it needed both of P and K nutrients to out yield the greatest seed yield ha −1”
Claim · model-written summary
Kawmy-1 had greatest seed yield without K application.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Kawmy-1e4
- Treatment
- without K applicatione4
- Outcome
- seed yielde4
- Direction
- greateste4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e4“Kawmy-1 gave the greatest seed yield ha −1 without K application”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors prefer combined P and K for V2010.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- V2010e5
- Outcome
- 75 kg P 2 O 5 + 57.6 kg K 2 O is preferablee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e5“the combination of 75 kg P 2 O 5 + 57.6 kg K 2 O is preferable for V2010 and 75 kg P 2 O 5 alone for Kawmy-1 to produce the greatest yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors prefer P alone for Kawmy-1.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Material
- Kawmy-1e5
- Outcome
- 75 kg P 2 O 5 alonee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
e5“the combination of 75 kg P 2 O 5 + 57.6 kg K 2 O is preferable for V2010 and 75 kg P 2 O 5 alone for Kawmy-1 to produce the greatest yield”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.