Abstract
We designed nanoparticles able to protect the elicitor on the leaves of grapevines over long periods of time. The foliar application of this nanoelicitor produced wines with high content of stilbenes at significantly reduced dosages.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
The nanoparticles protected the elicitor on grapevine leaves over long periods.
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“We designed nanoparticles able to protect the elicitor on the leaves of grapevines over long periods of time.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nanoelicitor application produced wines with high stilbene content at significantly reduced dosages.
- Treatment
- foliar application of this nanoelicitore0
- Outcome
- high content of stilbenese0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- significantly reduced dosagese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“We designed nanoparticles able to protect the elicitor on the leaves of grapevines over long periods of time. The foliar application of this nanoelicitor produced wines with high content of stilbenes at significantly reduced dosages.”
The same questions in other papers
application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.