Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of biofertilization in the morpho physiology and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Ariany Colás – Sánchez; Beatriz Díaz – Pérez; Alianny Rodríguez-Urrutia; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is widely cultivated in Cuba principally in small farm areas because its role as a principal component of the daily diet. The use of effective native rhizobia as natural biofertilizer will positive contributes to the production of this grain. In order to evaluate the effect of single Rhizobium pisi and EcoMic® inoculation on morphological parameters and yield of common bean, was performed the present research at the intermediate sowing season of the 2015-2016 (November - January). The study was developed in farm´s areas of CCS "Lino del Rio" under an Inceptisol soil in the municipality of Placetas in Villa Clara province. In the study, the genotype Delicia-364 was used and the parameters of nodulation, root and shoot biomass and yield were evaluated, as well as the possible mechanisms of plant growth promotion of the strains used. All the inoculation variants increased the nodulation and, consequently, the dry biomass. The maximum values in the number of nodules were observed with the inoculation of R. pisi 40983. The yield and its components were positively stimulated with the inoculation of R. pisi 40983 (362 kg ha-1) and 40982 (357 kg ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All inoculation variants increased nodulation and, consequently, dry biomass of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
nodulation and, consequently, the dry biomasse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All the inoculation variants increased the nodulation and, consequently, the dry biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of biofertilization in the morpho physiology and yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum number of nodules in common bean was observed with inoculation of R. pisi 40983.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculation of R. pisi 40983e2
Interactor
R. pisi 40983Rhizobium pisie2symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese2
Direction
maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The maximum values in the number of nodules were observed with the inoculation of R. pisi 40983”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of biofertilization in the morpho physiology and yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and its components of common bean were positively stimulated by R. pisi 40983 inoculation, reaching 362 kg ha-1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculation of R. pisi 40983e3
Interactor
R. pisi 40983Rhizobium pisie3symbiont
Outcome
yield and its componentse3
Direction
positively stimulatede3
Value
362 kg ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The yield and its components were positively stimulated with the inoculation of R. pisi 40983 (362 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of biofertilization in the morpho physiology and yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and its components of common bean were positively stimulated by R. pisi 40982 inoculation, reaching 357 kg ha-1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculation of R. pisie4
Interactor
R. pisiRhizobium pisie4symbiont
Outcome
yield and its componentse4
Direction
positively stimulatede4
Value
357 kg ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The yield and its components were positively stimulated with the inoculation of R. pisi 40983 (362 kg ha-1) and 40982 (357 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of biofertilization in the morpho physiology and yield of common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.