Paper · 2021 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Exploration of Potential Bacterial Endophytes against Root Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in Banana

Ganeshan k; Vetrivelkalai p; Bhagawati B; et al.

19
claims
35
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field survey was conducted in 12 districts of Assam viz., Jorhat, Golaghat, Nagaon, Marigaon, Goalpara, Dibrugarh, Tinsukia, Lakhimpur, Dhemaji, Sivsagar, Kamrup and Barpeta. A total of 92 root samples were collected and 37 bacterial isolates were isolated from commercial banana cultivars. The culture filtrates extracted from 37 endophytic bacterial isolates, were screened against southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in vitro and under pot culture studies. The five bacterial isolates viz., EB4, EB8, BC1, BC11 and BC12 showed 100% inhibition of egg hatching and juvenile mortality of M. incognita with an exposure period of 48 and 72h. On seed bacterization, with these five promising isolates, two isolates viz.EB4, BC1 significantly enhanced germination percentage (33.33, 25.31%) and vigour index (75.5, 64.39%) of paddy, receptively. The potential bacterial isolates viz., BC1 and EB4 were identified as Lysinibacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp., respectively , based on the morphological phenotypic and biochemical characterization. The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control. The bacterial endophytes viz., Pseudomonas sp. (EB4), Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) were also significantly increased the growth parameters viz., shoot length (43.33, 39.18%), and root length (78.24, 59.26%) and pesudostem girth (58.38, 52.13%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five bacterial isolates (EB4, EB8, BC1, BC11, BC12) gave 100% inhibition of egg hatching and juvenile mortality of M. incognita in vitro.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
EB4, EB8, BC1, BC11 and BC12e1
Treatment
culture filtratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
egg hatching and juvenile mortalitye1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
100%e1
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e0

“The culture filtrates extracted from 37 endophytic bacterial isolates, were screened against southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“The five bacterial isolates viz., EB4, EB8, BC1, BC11 and BC12 showed 100% inhibition of egg hatching and juvenile mortality of M. incognita with an exposure period of 48 and 72h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 seed bacterization significantly enhanced paddy germination percentage (33.33%).

Taxon
paddye2
Material
EB4e2
Treatment
seed bacterizatione2
Interactor
EB4e2symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
33.33e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“On seed bacterization, with these five promising isolates, two isolates viz.EB4, BC1 significantly enhanced germination percentage (33.33, 25.31%) and vigour index (75.5, 64.39%) of paddy, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 seed bacterization significantly enhanced paddy germination percentage (25.31%).

Taxon
paddye2
Material
BC1e2
Treatment
seed bacterizatione2
Interactor
BC1e2symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
25.31%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“On seed bacterization, with these five promising isolates, two isolates viz.EB4, BC1 significantly enhanced germination percentage (33.33, 25.31%) and vigour index (75.5, 64.39%) of paddy, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 seed bacterization significantly enhanced paddy vigour index (75.5).

Taxon
paddye2
Material
EB4e2
Treatment
seed bacterizatione2
Interactor
EB4e2symbiont
Outcome
vigour indexe2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
75.5e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“On seed bacterization, with these five promising isolates, two isolates viz.EB4, BC1 significantly enhanced germination percentage (33.33, 25.31%) and vigour index (75.5, 64.39%) of paddy, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 seed bacterization significantly enhanced paddy vigour index (64.39%).

Taxon
paddye2
Material
BC1e2
Treatment
seed bacterizatione2
Interactor
BC1e2symbiont
Outcome
vigour indexe2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
64.39%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“On seed bacterization, with these five promising isolates, two isolates viz.EB4, BC1 significantly enhanced germination percentage (33.33, 25.31%) and vigour index (75.5, 64.39%) of paddy, receptively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–857 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate BC1 was identified as Lysinibacillus sp. by morphological, phenotypic and biochemical characterization.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
BC1e3
Interactor
Lysinibacillus sp.Lysinibacilluse3symbiont
Outcome
morphological phenotypic and biochemical characterizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lysinibacillus
Lysinibacillus · InteractorJames Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The potential bacterial isolates viz., BC1 and EB4 were identified as Lysinibacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp., respectively , based on the morphological phenotypic and biochemical characterization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolate EB4 was identified as Pseudomonas sp. by morphological, phenotypic and biochemical characterization.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
EB4e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase3symbiont
Outcome
morphological phenotypic and biochemical characterizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e3

“The potential bacterial isolates viz., BC1 and EB4 were identified as Lysinibacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp., respectively , based on the morphological phenotypic and biochemical characterization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 significantly reduced the soil nematode population (61.64%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)Lysinibacillus sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
soile4
Direction
reducede4
Value
61.64e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysinibacillus sp.
Lysinibacillus sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)James Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 significantly reduced the soil nematode population (56.71%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)Pseudomonas sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
soile4
Direction
reducede4
Value
56.71%e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 significantly reduced root nematode population (77.29%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)Lysinibacillus sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root nematode populatione4
Direction
reducede4
Value
77.29e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysinibacillus sp.
Lysinibacillus sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)James Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 significantly reduced root nematode population (68.87%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)Pseudomonas sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root nematode populatione4
Direction
reducede4
Value
68.87%e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 reduced adult female numbers (73.97%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)Lysinibacillus sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of adult femalese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
73.97e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysinibacillus sp.
Lysinibacillus sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)James Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 reduced adult female numbers (69.89%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)Pseudomonas sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of adult femalese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
69.89%e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 reduced egg masses (85.63%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)Lysinibacillus sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg massese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
85.63e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysinibacillus sp.
Lysinibacillus sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)James Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 reduced egg masses (80.11%) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)Pseudomonas sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg massese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
80.11%e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC1 reduced root-knot index (1.33) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)Lysinibacillus sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot indexe4
Direction
reducede4
Value
1.33e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysinibacillus sp.
Lysinibacillus sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)James Kulleck, NASA/JPL · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EB4 reduced root-knot index (1.67) of M. incognita in pot culture.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e4
Treatment
bacterial endophytese4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)Pseudomonas sp.e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root-knot indexe4
Direction
reducede4
Value
1.67e4
Comparator
untreated controle4
Setting
pot culturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the bacterial endophytes viz., Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly reduced the soil (61.64, 56.71%) and root nematode population (77.29, 68.87%), number of adult females (73.97, 69.89%), egg masses (85.63, 80.11%) and root-knot index (1.33, 1.67) of M. incognita compared to untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) significantly increased growth parameters of banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1)e5
Treatment
bacterial endophytese5
Outcome
growth parameterse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“The bacterial endophytes viz., Pseudomonas sp. (EB4), Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) were also significantly increased the growth parameters viz., shoot length (43.33, 39.18%), and root length (78.24, 59.26%) and pesudostem girth (58.38, 52.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas sp. (EB4) significantly increased growth parameters of banana.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Pseudomonas sp. (EB4)e5
Treatment
bacterial endophytese5
Outcome
growth parameterse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“The bacterial endophytes viz., Pseudomonas sp. (EB4), Lysinibacillus sp. (BC1) were also significantly increased the growth parameters viz., shoot length (43.33, 39.18%), and root length (78.24, 59.26%) and pesudostem girth (58.38, 52.13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1655 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · MusaPositive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.