Paper · 2021 · South African Journal of Botany

A quality control perspective on Devil's claw, Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri: phytochemical analysis and DNA barcoding

E. Pretorius; N.P. Mncwangi; R.M. Kabongo; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Devil's claw is a popular natural anti-inflammatory phytomedicine. The preparation of Devil's claw products is complicated by the similarity between the morphotypes of Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri. This study investigated the potential of a validated ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) method to investigate the harpagoside content of methanol extracts of the secondary tubers of both species. In addition, DNA barcoding was used to determine the identity of the Harpagophytum species included in commercial Devil's claw products. Herbal reference material of H. procumbens and H. zeyheri, originally harvested in southern Africa, was morphologically authenticated and commercial products containing Harpagophytum were purchased on the internet using the search terms “Harpagophytum” or “Devil's claw.” High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) and UHPLC-MS was used for the qualitative and quantitative determination of harpagoside content in commercial products. The UHPLC-MS method developed had a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.165 µg/mL and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.499 µg/mL. Quantitative UHPLC-MS analysis revealed high variability in the harpagoside content for both species; H. procumbens (0.17-4.37%) and H. zeyheri (0.00-3.07%). Only 41% of H. procumbens and 17% of H. zeyheri raw materials contained harpagoside. Using HPTLC, 90% of the commercial products tested were determined to contain harpagoside. The results were congruent with the UHPLC-MS analysis where the harpagoside content was out of specification for 10% of analyzed commercial products. The harpagoside content in commercial products varied from not detected to 3.50%. PCR amplification followed by comparative sequencing analysis of trnL-F, and ycf1 plastid gene amplicons indicated specific sites in trnL-F at positions 118 and 146 and at position 538 in ycf1 amplicons suitable to distinguish the two Harpagophytum species. These sites were used to barcode the herbal products and Character-based Barcode Recognition Obtained with Nucleotide eXposés (BRONX) analyses verified the taxonomic identity of the Harpagophytum in the samples. The results revealed that 76% (16/21) of the commercial products tested were incorrectly labelled as H. procumbens and, instead, contained H. zeyheri. Our study suggests that DNA barcoding in combination with the UHPLC-MS and HPTLC could significantly support herbal product authentication. This study contributed knowledge and methods that can be implemented to enhance the quality of commercial Devil's claw products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UHPLC-MS method had a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.165 µg/mL.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
limit of detection (LOD)e1
Value
0.165 µg/mLe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The UHPLC-MS method developed had a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.165 µg/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1110 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UHPLC-MS method had a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.499 µg/mL.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
limit of quantification (LOQ)e1
Value
0.499 µg/mLe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 0.499 µg/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside content of H. procumbens varied widely, from 0.17 to 4.37%.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense1
Organ / stage
secondary tuberse2
Outcome
harpagoside contente1
Value
0.17-4.37%e1
Qualifier
high variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“high variability in the harpagoside content for both species; H. procumbens (0.17-4.37%) and H. zeyheri (0.00-3.07%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1319 · show in text ↑
e2

“methanol extracts of the secondary tubers of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside content of H. zeyheri varied widely, from 0.00 to 3.07%.

Organ / stage
secondary tuberse2
Outcome
harpagoside contente1
Value
0.00-3.07%e1
Qualifier
high variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“high variability in the harpagoside content for both species; H. procumbens (0.17-4.37%) and H. zeyheri (0.00-3.07%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1319 · show in text ↑
e2

“methanol extracts of the secondary tubers of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–453 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 41% of H. procumbens raw materials contained harpagoside.

Taxon
H. procumbensHarpagophytum procumbense3
Outcome
raw materials contained harpagosidee3
Value
41%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum procumbens
Harpagophytum procumbens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Only 41% of H. procumbens and 17% of H. zeyheri raw materials contained harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 17% of H. zeyheri raw materials contained harpagoside.

Outcome
raw materials contained harpagosidee3
Value
17%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum zeyheri
Harpagophytum zeyheri · TaxonDr. Alexey Yakovlev · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Only 41% of H. procumbens and 17% of H. zeyheri raw materials contained harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using HPTLC, 90% of the commercial products tested were determined to contain harpagoside.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
contain harpagosidee4
Value
90%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“Using HPTLC, 90% of the commercial products tested were determined to contain harpagoside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UHPLC-MS found harpagoside content out of specification in 10% of analysed commercial products.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
out of specificatione5
Value
10%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results were congruent with the UHPLC-MS analysis where the harpagoside content was out of specification for 10% of analyzed commercial products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpagoside content in commercial products ranged from not detected to 3.50%.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
harpagoside contente6
Value
not detected to 3.50%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“The harpagoside content in commercial products varied from not detected to 3.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1727 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific trnL-F sites at positions 118 and 146 and ycf1 site 538 were suitable to distinguish the two Harpagophytum species.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Gene
trnL-Fe7
Outcome
suitable to distinguish the two Harpagophytum speciese7
Value
positions 118 and 146 and at position 538e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e7

“specific sites in trnL-F at positions 118 and 146 and at position 538 in ycf1 amplicons suitable to distinguish the two Harpagophytum species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

76% (16/21) of commercial products were labelled as H. procumbens but contained H. zeyheri.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
incorrectly labelled as H. procumbense0
Value
76% (16/21)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“76% (16/21) of the commercial products tested were incorrectly labelled as H. procumbens and, instead, contained H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2225–2348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRONX analyses verified the taxonomic identity of Harpagophytum in the herbal products.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytume0
Outcome
taxonomic identity of the Harpagophytum in the samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Character-based Barcode Recognition Obtained with Nucleotide eXposés (BRONX) analyses verified the taxonomic identity of the Harpagophytum in the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2197 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

DNA barcoding combined with UHPLC-MS and HPTLC could significantly support herbal product authentication.

Taxon
HarpagophytumHarpagophytumt0
Outcome
herbal product authenticatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpagophytum
Harpagophytum · TaxonNicola van Berkel · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Harpagophytum procumbens and H. zeyheri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“DNA barcoding in combination with the UHPLC-MS and HPTLC could significantly support herbal product authentication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2374–2488 · show in text ↑