Paper · 2021 · Agronomy Journal

Correlation and regression models of tomato yield in response to plant growth by different bacterial inoculants and inoculation methods

Tulja Sanam; Triveni S; Sridhar Goud Nerella; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The focus of this research is to evaluate the performance of Bacillus , Pseudomonas , Azotobacter , and Azospirillum for their plant growth abilities in vitro and in vivo. The best performing bacterial isolates from preliminary screening (in vitro) were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) of 0.25–22.63 and 5.9–31.8 μg ml –1 , respectively, eight best isolates were further tested for their efficacy in promoting crop growth and yield of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) by different application methods namely seed coating, soil application, and seedling root dip method. The factorial data analysis provided evidence that the interaction of bacterial isolates and different inoculation procedures together generated better yield in the greenhouse pot experiment. The findings suggest that the inoculation of Azospirillum strain ASP25 by seedling root dip method produced greater yields. Correlation and regression models hypothesize that all the variables are positively correlated with yield at P < .01 and growth variables like number of fruits per plant ( r 2 = .886), shoot length ( r 2 = .695), and root volume ( r 2 = .554) at P ≤ .0001 contribute to the yield parameter individually and by multiple regression model all the plant growth variables together increased fruit yield per plant by 89% ( r 2 = .899). These results demonstrate that a high yield is always linked to a healthy vegetative development. However, as technology in agriculture progresses, the proposed method points to the usage and development of computer applications to estimate crop output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected bacterial isolates produced IAA at 0.25–22.63 μg ml –1 in vitro.

Taxon
bacterial isolatese0
Outcome
indole acetic acid (IAA)e0
Value
0.25–22.63e0
Qualifier
μg ml –1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The best performing bacterial isolates from preliminary screening (in vitro) were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) of 0.25–22.63 and 5.9–31.8 μg ml –1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected bacterial isolates produced GA3 at 5.9–31.8 μg ml –1 in vitro.

Taxon
bacterial isolatese0
Outcome
gibberellic acid (GA 3 )e0
Value
5.9–31.8 μg ml –1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The best performing bacterial isolates from preliminary screening (in vitro) were able to produce indole acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) of 0.25–22.63 and 5.9–31.8 μg ml –1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions of bacterial isolates and inoculation procedures generated better greenhouse yield.

Treatment
bacterial isolates and different inoculation procedurese0
Interactor
bacterial isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Setting
greenhouse pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The factorial data analysis provided evidence that the interaction of bacterial isolates and different inoculation procedures together generated better yield in the greenhouse pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum ASP25 inoculation by seedling root dip produced greater yields.

Treatment
inoculation of Azospirillum strain ASP25 by seedling root dip methode0
Interactor
Azospirillum strain ASP25e0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings suggest that the inoculation of Azospirillum strain ASP25 by seedling root dip method produced greater yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All analyzed variables were positively correlated with yield at P < .01.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
P < .01e0
Comparator
all the variablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation and regression models hypothesize that all the variables are positively correlated with yield at P < .01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit number explained yield variation with r2 = .886 at P ≤ .0001.

Outcome
yield parametere0
Value
r 2 = .886e0
Qualifier
P ≤ .0001e0
Comparator
number of fruits per plante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth variables like number of fruits per plant ( r 2 = .886), shoot length ( r 2 = .695), and root volume ( r 2 = .554) at P ≤ .0001 contribute to the yield parameter individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length explained yield variation with r2 = .695 at P ≤ .0001.

Outcome
yield parametere0
Value
r 2 = .695e0
Qualifier
P ≤ .0001e0
Comparator
shoot lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth variables like number of fruits per plant ( r 2 = .886), shoot length ( r 2 = .695), and root volume ( r 2 = .554) at P ≤ .0001 contribute to the yield parameter individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root volume explained yield variation with r2 = .554 at P ≤ .0001.

Outcome
yield parametere0
Value
r 2 = .554e0
Qualifier
P ≤ .0001e0
Comparator
root volumee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth variables like number of fruits per plant ( r 2 = .886), shoot length ( r 2 = .695), and root volume ( r 2 = .554) at P ≤ .0001 contribute to the yield parameter individually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The multiple regression model linked combined plant growth variables to an 89% fruit yield increase, with r2 = .899.

Outcome
fruit yield per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
r 2 = .899e0
Comparator
all the plant growth variablese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by multiple regression model all the plant growth variables together increased fruit yield per plant by 89% ( r 2 = .899).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose developing computer applications to estimate crop output.

Outcome
usage and development of computer applications to estimate crop outpute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proposed method points to the usage and development of computer applications to estimate crop output.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.