Paper · 2021 · Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow State Agricultural Academy named after K. A. Timiryazev

CROP STRUCTURE AND YIELD OF GRAIN LEGUMES DEPENDING ON AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE FOREST-STEPPE ZONE OF THE VOLGA REGION

Timirâzevskaâ selʹskohozâjstvennaâ akademiâ; Rezida Akhmetovna Mustafina

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of the main tillage and plant protection on the yield and its structure of grain legumes has been studied. Combined tillage with adaptively integrated plant protection increased the studied parameters by 5,4-8,7% compared to the minimum tillage and the first level of plant protection. The maximum yield was obtained on peas by the combined tillage in crop rotations of 2,65 t / ha, and with the minimum tillage – 2,36 t / ha. The effect of combined tillage on soybeans was also higher than on the minimum, where the yield was 2,25 t / ha and 1.94 t / ha, respectively. The yield of chickpea is also higher for combined processing – 2,27 t / ha, and at the minimum –1.94 t / ha. The yield of lupine for soil cultivation is 2,23 t / ha and – 2,00 t / ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined tillage with integrated plant protection increased the studied grain legume parameters by 5.4-8.7% compared with minimum tillage.

Taxon
GRAIN LEGUMESt0
Treatment
Combined tillage with adaptively integrated plant protectione1
Outcome
the studied parameterse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5,4-8,7%e1
Comparator
minimum tillage and the first level of plant protectione1

Verbatim

t0

“GRAIN LEGUMES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined tillage with adaptively integrated plant protection increased the studied parameters by 5,4-8,7% compared to the minimum tillage and the first level of plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined tillage gave the maximum pea yield of 2.65 t/ha, against 2.36 t/ha under minimum tillage.

Treatment
combined tillagee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
2,65 t / hae2
Qualifier
2,36 t / hae2
Comparator
minimum tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The maximum yield was obtained on peas by the combined tillage in crop rotations of 2,65 t / ha, and with the minimum tillage – 2,36 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined tillage raised soybean yield to 2.25 t/ha, against 1.94 t/ha under minimum tillage.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe3
Treatment
combined tillagee3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
2,25 t/hae3
Qualifier
1.94 t/hae3
Comparator
minimume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The effect of combined tillage on soybeans was also higher than on the minimum, where the yield was 2,25 t/ha and 1.94 t/ha, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 441–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined processing raised chickpea yield to 2.27 t/ha, against 1.94 t/ha at the minimum.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Treatment
combined processinge4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
2,27 t / hae4
Qualifier
1.94 t / hae4
Comparator
at the minimume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The yield of chickpea is also higher for combined processing – 2,27 t / ha, and at the minimum –1.94 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–691 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lupine yield under soil cultivation was 2.23 t/ha.

Taxon
lupinee5
Treatment
soil cultivatione5
Outcome
yielde5
Value
2,23 t / hae5

Verbatim

e5

“The yield of lupine for soil cultivation is 2,23 t / ha and – 2,00 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–766 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.