Paper · 2013 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Effects of wild luffa rootstocks on fruit quality and photosynthetic physiology of bitter gourd.

Zhendong Chen; Liang JiaZuo; Che JiangLü; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]In order to provide scientific support to rootstock selection of bitter gourd, the effects of wild luffa rootstocks (Luffa cylindrical Roem.) on fruit quality and plant photosynthetic physiology were studied. [Method]Bitter gourd cv. Guinongke 2 were grafted on four different luffa rootstocks (IL1: Luffa acutangula cv. Shuangyi; IL6, IL9, IL16: Luffa cylindrica) to study effect of rootstocks on fruit quality, leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthesis characteristics of bitter gourd. [Result]All rootstocks improved fruit quality, and the best effect came from rootstock IL16. The chlorophyll contents of young leaves of grafted seedling were significantly improved by all rootstocks, however, remarkably decreased in mature leaves. The most significant impact of chlorophyll content came from rootstock IL9. All rootstocks significantly improved the photosynthetic rate of grafted seedling with the highest one from rootstock IL9, while grafted seedlings with rootstock IL16 had the highest apparent quantum efficiency. Light saturation point and light compensation point were significantly decreased by grafting. [Conclusion]Luffa rootstocks IL9 and IL16 could better improve the fruit quality and luminous energy utilization of bitter gourd than other rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rootstocks improved bitter gourd fruit quality, with IL16 best.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
rootstock IL16e0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All rootstocks improved fruit quality, and the best effect came from rootstock IL16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All rootstocks significantly increased chlorophyll in young leaves.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Organ / stage
young leavese0
Treatment
all rootstockse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll contents of young leaves of grafted seedling were significantly improved by all rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks decreased chlorophyll content in mature leaves.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Organ / stage
mature leavese0
Treatment
rootstockse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll contents of young leaves of grafted seedling were significantly improved by all rootstocks, however, remarkably decreased in mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IL9 had the strongest effect on chlorophyll content.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
rootstock IL9e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
most significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most significant impact of chlorophyll content came from rootstock IL9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All rootstocks significantly improved photosynthetic rate, highest with IL9.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
rootstock IL9e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All rootstocks significantly improved the photosynthetic rate of grafted seedling with the highest one from rootstock IL9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IL16 grafted seedlings had the highest apparent quantum efficiency.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Material
rootstock IL16e0
Outcome
apparent quantum efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted seedlings with rootstock IL16 had the highest apparent quantum efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting significantly decreased light saturation and compensation points.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiat0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
Light saturation point and light compensation pointe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light saturation point and light compensation point were significantly decreased by grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“bitter gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored IL9 and IL16 over other rootstocks for fruit quality and light use.

Taxon
bitter gourdMomordica charantiae0
Outcome
fruit quality and luminous energy utilizatione0
Comparator
other rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Momordica charantia
Momordica charantia · TaxonMorenga01 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Luffa rootstocks IL9 and IL16 could better improve the fruit quality and luminous energy utilization of bitter gourd than other rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1282 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: pigments · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Momordica charantia (bitter gourd)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.