Paper · 2012 · Scientific Papers - Series B, Horticulture

Evolution research on the influence of micorrhiza on culture of watermelons with plants grafted on sandy soils from Southern Oltenia.

I. Răţoi; V. Toma; M. Croitoru; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Treatment of the soil with micorrhizal fungi on plants directly from the experimental field not led to higher levels of production instead when the inoculation is done directly in the hotbed there have been large increases in production. The production was dependent of the dose of inoculum, 33.1% in the case of inoculation with 50 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soil, and 73,1% in the case of inoculati on with 100 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soil. Inoculation with fungi micorrhizal has proved to be beneficial and of average weight fruit. The spore of weight of fruit from the treated variants comparative untreated variant is the effect of arbusculare micorrhiza, which enhancing the ability of absorption, but also the quantity of nutrients, led to an acceleration of th e photosyntetic process and default to shorten the length of maturity of the fruit. The rate of colonization in the case of variants with the inoculation of micorrhizal fungi was associated with organic fertilisation and was mu ch reduced comparative to the untreated variant .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field soil treatment with mycorrhizal fungi did not raise watermelon production.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Treatment of the soil with micorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
micorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
levels of productione0
Direction
not led to highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the soil with micorrhizal fungi on plants directly from the experimental field not led to higher levels of production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–130 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hotbed inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi produced large increases in watermelon production.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
micorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
productione0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the inoculation is done directly in the hotbed there have been large increases in production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment of the soil with micorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 50 mycorrhizal spores per 10 grams of soil raised watermelon production by 33.1%.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
inoculation with 50 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soile0
Interactor
micorrhizal sporese0symbiont
Outcome
productione1
Direction
increasese1
Value
33.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“33.1% in the case of inoculation with 50 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–371 · show in text ↑
e1

“large increases in production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–236 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with 100 mycorrhizal spores per 10 grams of soil raised watermelon production by 73,1%.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
inoculati on with 100 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soile0
Interactor
micorrhizal sporese0symbiont
Outcome
productione1
Direction
increasese1
Value
73,1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“73,1% in the case of inoculati on with 100 micorrhizal spores to 10 grams of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–458 · show in text ↑
e1

“large increases in production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–236 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation benefited watermelon average fruit weight.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Inoculation with fungi micorrhizale0
Interactor
fungi micorrhizale0symbiont
Outcome
average weight fruite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with fungi micorrhizal has proved to be beneficial and of average weight fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute faster watermelon fruit maturity to arbuscular mycorrhiza mediated nutrient absorption and photosynthesis.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Interactor
arbusculare micorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
length of maturity of the fruite0
Direction
shortene0
Qualifier
enhancing the ability of absorptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of arbusculare micorrhiza, which enhancing the ability of absorption, but also the quantity of nutrients, led to an acceleration of th e photosyntetic process and default to shorten the length of maturity of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization rate with mycorrhizal inoculation and organic fertilization was much lower than in the untreated variant.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
inoculation of micorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
micorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
rate of colonizatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of colonization in the case of variants with the inoculation of micorrhizal fungi was associated with organic fertilisation and was mu ch reduced comparative to the untreated variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.