Paper · 2008 · HortScience

Effects of Inoculations with Mycorrhizal Fungi of Soilless Potting Mixes During Transplant Production on Watermelon Growth and Early Fruit Yield

Andreas Westphal; Nicole L. Snyder; Lijuan Xing; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai, crops are continuously exposed to soilborne diseases. In many areas of the United States, greenhouse-raised watermelon seedlings are transplanted to the field to allow for early crop establishment and early fruit production. This practice can result in weakened root systems, which potentially make the plant prone to premature senescence and reduce crop productivity. Mycorrhizal fungi have been reported to improve plant growth in many crops through enhanced root growth and function. We hypothesized that amending potting mixes with commercial inocula of mycorrhizal fungi during seeding of watermelon in a greenhouse would improve watermelon production when seedlings were transplanted to the field. Colonization of watermelon roots with mycorrhizal fungi from three commercial formulations was compared with the colonization of onion roots to confirm the efficacy of the mycorrhizae. Two inocula of mycorrhizal fungi that resulted in colonization of watermelon roots were tested in the field and glasshouse for their potential to improve watermelon production. MycoApply improved early plant growth in two tests, one under Meloidogyne incognita -infested conditions in loamy sand and another at two phosphorus fertilizer levels (0 or 22 kg·ha −1 P) in a loam soil. Mycor Vam Mini plug improved early fruit yield in soil infested with M. incognita . Application of Myconate (formononetin), a potential enhancer of colonization with mycorrhizae, increased early fruit yield in M. incognita -infested soil. Myconate had positive effects when potting mixes were not amended with inoculum of mycorrhizal fungi, but reduced watermelon growth when mycorrhizal fungi were supplied in the potting mix. In glasshouse tests, inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi did not suppress disease. Mycorrhizal fungi inoculations improved early plant establishment and increased the most valuable early fruit yield under some environmental stress conditions but did not increase total fruit yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three commercial formulations colonized watermelon roots.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
Colonization of watermelon rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of watermelon roots with mycorrhizal fungi from three commercial formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MycoApply improved early watermelon growth under Meloidogyne incognita infestation in loamy sand.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
MycoApplye1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
early plant growthe1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
loamy sande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“MycoApply improved early plant growth in two tests, one under Meloidogyne incognita -infested conditions in loamy sand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MycoApply improved early watermelon growth at two phosphorus fertilizer levels in loam soil.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
MycoApplye1
Outcome
early plant growthe1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
two phosphorus fertilizer levels (0 or 22 kg·ha −1 P)e1
Setting
loam soile1

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“MycoApply improved early plant growth in two tests, one under Meloidogyne incognita -infested conditions in loamy sand and another at two phosphorus fertilizer levels (0 or 22 kg·ha −1 P) in a loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1324 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycor Vam Mini plug improved early watermelon fruit yield in soil infested with M. incognita.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Mycor Vam Mini pluge1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
early fruit yielde1
Direction
improvede1
Setting
soil infested with M. incognitae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycor Vam Mini plug improved early fruit yield in soil infested with M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myconate increased early watermelon fruit yield in M. incognita infested soil.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Myconate (formononetin)e1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
early fruit yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of Myconate (formononetin), a potential enhancer of colonization with mycorrhizae, increased early fruit yield in M. incognita -infested soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myconate had positive effects on watermelon without mycorrhizal inoculum in the potting mix.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Myconatee1
Outcome
positive effectse1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
potting mixes were not amended with inoculum of mycorrhizal fungie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Myconate had positive effects when potting mixes were not amended with inoculum of mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myconate reduced watermelon growth when mycorrhizal fungi were in the potting mix.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
Myconatee1
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
watermelon growthe1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
mycorrhizal fungi were supplied in the potting mixe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Myconate had positive effects when potting mixes were not amended with inoculum of mycorrhizal fungi, but reduced watermelon growth when mycorrhizal fungi were supplied in the potting mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation did not suppress watermelon disease in glasshouse tests.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
inoculation with mycorrhizal fungie1
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
diseasee1
Direction
did not suppresse1
Setting
glasshousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“In glasshouse tests, inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi did not suppress disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation improved early watermelon plant establishment under some environmental stress conditions.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculationse1
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
early plant establishmente1
Direction
improvede1
Qualifier
under some environmental stress conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculations improved early plant establishment and increased the most valuable early fruit yield under some environmental stress conditions but did not increase total fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased early watermelon fruit yield under some environmental stress conditions.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculationse1
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
early fruit yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
under some environmental stress conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculations improved early plant establishment and increased the most valuable early fruit yield under some environmental stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation did not increase total watermelon fruit yield.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculationse1
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
total fruit yieldse1
Direction
did not increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watermelon, Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculations improved early plant establishment and increased the most valuable early fruit yield under some environmental stress conditions but did not increase total fruit yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2034 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 10 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.