Paper · 2018 · HortScience

Performance of Grafted Seedless Watermelon Plants with and without Root Excision under Inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum Race 2

Xin Zhao; Qianru Liu; M. Tatiana Sanchez; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fusarium wilt of watermelon can be effectively managed by grafting with resistant rootstocks. Excision and regeneration of grafted seedling roots is a common practice among cucurbit-grafting nurseries that has not been thoroughly examined. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of grafted and nongrafted watermelon plants under both greenhouse and field conditions when inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (FON) race 2, and assess the effect of root excision on growth of grafted plants with Cucurbita moschata and Cucurbita maxima × C. moschata rootstocks. Two greenhouse experiments (Fall 2015 and Spring 2016) and one field trial (Spring 2016) of seedless watermelon ‘Melody’ were conducted in this study. In both greenhouse experiments, inoculated, nongrafted watermelon plants showed a significantly higher percentage of recovered Fusarium spp. colonies (70% to 75%) compared with grafted treatments (0% to 7.5%). Some plant growth measurements, including the longest vine length and aboveground fresh and dry weight, indicated less vigorous growth for nongrafted plants compared with the grafted treatments. Significantly higher percent recovery of Fusarium spp. below the graft union was observed in the grafted plants with root excision and regeneration treatment (3.7%) in contrast to the intact root treatment (0.5%), suggesting that the root excision method may possibly create entry points for FON infections. Overall, the root excision treatment showed little influence on aboveground growth and root characteristics of grafted plants. Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size. Averaged over all the grafted treatments, the increase in marketable fruit number and weight reached 108.3% and 240.9%, respectively, and the total fruit number and weight increase was at 80.0% and 237.2%, respectively. However, grafted plants also exhibited greater levels of root-knot nematode infestation as indicated by the significantly higher root galling ratings. Results from this study demonstrated that grafting with squash rootstocks can effectively limit FON colonization in seedless watermelon plants, although more research in rootstock selection and testing is needed to optimize the use of grafted plants for improving plant growth and fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated nongrafted watermelon plants had a significantly higher percentage of recovered Fusarium spp. colonies (70% to 75%) than grafted treatments (0% to 7.5%) in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
inoculated, nongraftede1
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume1pathogen
Outcome
percentage of recovered Fusarium spp. coloniese1
Direction
highere1
Value
70% to 75%e1
Comparator
grafted treatmentse1
Setting
greenhouse experimentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In both greenhouse experiments, inoculated, nongrafted watermelon plants showed a significantly higher percentage of recovered Fusarium spp. colonies (70% to 75%) compared with grafted treatments (0% to 7.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root excision with regeneration significantly increased recovery of Fusarium spp. below the graft union (3.7%) compared with intact roots (0.5%) in grafted plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
root excision and regeneration treatmente2
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume2pathogen
Outcome
percent recovery of Fusarium spp. below the graft unione2
Direction
highere2
Value
3.7%e2
Qualifier
may possibly create entry points for FON infectionse1
Comparator
intact root treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seedless Watermelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significantly higher percent recovery of Fusarium spp. below the graft union was observed in the grafted plants with root excision and regeneration treatment (3.7%) in contrast to the intact root treatment (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggesting that the root excision method may possibly create entry points for FON infections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root excision had little influence on aboveground growth and root characteristics of grafted plants.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
root excision treatmente3
Outcome
aboveground growth and root characteristicse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seedless Watermelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“the root excision treatment showed little influence on aboveground growth and root characteristics of grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nongrafted plants showed less vigorous growth (longest vine length, aboveground fresh and dry weight) than grafted treatments.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
nongrafted plantse4
Outcome
longest vine length and aboveground fresh and dry weighte4
Direction
less vigorous growthe4
Comparator
grafted treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seedless Watermelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Some plant growth measurements, including the longest vine length and aboveground fresh and dry weight, indicated less vigorous growth for nongrafted plants compared with the grafted treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted Melody control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Material
Melodye5
Treatment
grafted watermelon with FON inoculatione5
Interactor
FONe5pathogen
Outcome
Yielde5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
increase of fruit number and sizee5
Comparator
noninoculated, nongraftede5
Setting
fumigated field triale5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over all grafted treatments, marketable fruit number increased by 108.3% relative to the noninoculated nongrafted control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
grafted treatmentse6
Outcome
marketable fruit numbere6
Direction
increasee6
Value
108.3%e6
Comparator
noninoculated, nongraftede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1803 · show in text ↑
e6

“Averaged over all the grafted treatments, the increase in marketable fruit number and weight reached 108.3% and 240.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over all grafted treatments, marketable fruit weight increased by 240.9% relative to the noninoculated nongrafted control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
grafted treatmentse6
Outcome
marketable fruit number and weighte6
Direction
increasee6
Value
240.9%e6
Comparator
noninoculated, nongraftede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1803 · show in text ↑
e6

“Averaged over all the grafted treatments, the increase in marketable fruit number and weight reached 108.3% and 240.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over all grafted treatments, total fruit number increased by 80.0% relative to the noninoculated nongrafted control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
grafted treatmentse6
Outcome
total fruit number and weighte7
Direction
increasee7
Value
80.0%e7
Comparator
noninoculated, nongraftede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1803 · show in text ↑
e6

“Averaged over all the grafted treatments, the increase in marketable fruit number and weight reached 108.3% and 240.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1937 · show in text ↑
e7

“the total fruit number and weight increase was at 80.0% and 237.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1943–2023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over all grafted treatments, total fruit weight increased by 237.2% relative to the noninoculated nongrafted control.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
grafted treatmentse6
Outcome
total fruit number and weighte7
Direction
increasee7
Value
237.2%e7
Comparator
noninoculated, nongraftede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yield of grafted watermelon with FON inoculation in the fumigated field trial was significantly higher than that of noninoculated, nongrafted ‘Melody’ (NGM) control as reflected by the increase of fruit number and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1803 · show in text ↑
e6

“Averaged over all the grafted treatments, the increase in marketable fruit number and weight reached 108.3% and 240.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1937 · show in text ↑
e7

“the total fruit number and weight increase was at 80.0% and 237.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1943–2023 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted plants had greater root-knot nematode infestation, indicated by significantly higher root galling ratings.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse1
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
root galling ratingse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seedless Watermelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafted plants also exhibited greater levels of root-knot nematode infestation as indicated by the significantly higher root galling ratings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2034–2174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting with squash rootstocks can effectively limit FON colonization in seedless watermelon plants.

Taxon
watermelon plantsCitrullus lanatuse1
Treatment
grafting with squash rootstockse1
Interactor
FONe1pathogen
Outcome
FON colonizatione1
Direction
effectively limite1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seedless Watermelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting with squash rootstocks can effectively limit FON colonization in seedless watermelon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2318 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Prior Helminthosporium carbonum gave stronger cross protection than the two other fungi.

    The Effects of Prior Inoculations with Non-Pathogenic Fungi on Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon1 · 1972 · compared with Fusarium oxysporium f. lycopersici (Sacc.) Snyder & Hansen, or Verticillium alboatrum Reinke & Berth

    Opposite direction

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · disease · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.