Paper · 2006 · Florence Research (University of Florence)

Marine Bioactive Substances (IPA Extract) Improve Foliar Ion Uptake and Water Stress Tolerance in Potted "Vitis vinifera" Plants.

Stefano Mancuso; Xavier Briand; Sergio Mugnai; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
172
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of marine bioactive substances (IPA extract) on K+ and Ca2+ fluxes and water stress tole- rance was evaluated on potted Vitis vinifera plantlets. Different foliar treatments were compared during the experiment: a control treatment (distilled water), a pure fertilizer treatment (9-5-4 at 2%), and a marine bioac- tive substances (IPA extract, supplied by BiotechMarine, Roullier Group, Pontrieux, France) treatment added to a fertilizer (0.1% solution of IP A extract with distilled water and 9-5-4 at 2%). Ion fluxes, measured by selec- tive non-invasive microelectrodes, were monitored in leaves. IPA extract significantly enhanced both potassium and calcium fluxes compared to the other treatments. Total dry weight and macro- and micro-nutrient content were subsequently measured: results showed an improved growth in IPA extract plants, together with a better capacity in accumulating macronutrients in plant organs, but not micronutrients, especially in leaves. Marine bioactive substances were finally tested for their effectiveness in promoting water stress tolerance: IP A extract was very effective in inducing waterstress tolerance, maintaining a higherleaf water potential and stomatal con- ductance during the stress period, and inducing a quick recovery in rehydrated plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract enhanced potassium fluxes relative to other foliar treatments.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
IPA extracte0
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“IPA extract significantly enhanced both potassium and calcium fluxes compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ion fluxes, measured by selec- tive non-invasive microelectrodes, were monitored in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract enhanced calcium fluxes relative to other foliar treatments.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IPA extracte0
Outcome
calcium fluxese0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“IPA extract significantly enhanced both potassium and calcium fluxes compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract improved plant growth.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IPA extracte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“results showed an improved growth in IPA extract plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract improved macronutrient accumulation, especially in leaves.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
IPA extracte1
Outcome
capacity in accumulating macronutrientse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“a better capacity in accumulating macronutrients in plant organs, but not micronutrients, especially in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPA extract plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract did not improve micronutrient accumulation.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IPA extracte1
Outcome
micronutrientse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“a better capacity in accumulating macronutrients in plant organs, but not micronutrients, especially in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–977 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPA extract plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract improved water stress tolerance.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IP A extracte0
Outcome
waterstress tolerancee0
Direction
inducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“IP A extract was very effective in inducing waterstress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract maintained higher leaf water potential during water stress.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
IPA extracte1
Outcome
water potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during the stress periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“maintaining a higherleaf water potential and stomatal con- ductance during the stress period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPA extract significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract maintained higher stomatal conductance during water stress.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IPA extracte1
Outcome
stomatal con- ductancee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
during the stress periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“maintaining a higherleaf water potential and stomatal con- ductance during the stress period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPA extract significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPA extract induced quick recovery after rehydration.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
IPA extracte1
Outcome
recoverye0
Direction
quicke0
Qualifier
rehydrated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vitis vinifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“inducing a quick recovery in rehydrated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPA extract significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–644 · show in text ↑

botanical · nutrient: content · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · physiology: water · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.