Paper · 2011 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Enhancing Productivity of Summer Irrigated Cotton Through Plant Growth Regulator and Foliar Nutrition 248

Rajendran K; Palchamy A; Sankaranarayanan K; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai to study the influence of plant growth regulator (NAA 40 ppm) and foliar nutrition (DAP 2%, KCl 1%) on summer irrigated cotton for enhancing the productivity along with recommended dose of fertilizers 60:30:30 Kg N,P 2 O 5 ,K 2 O ha -1 . The growth characters of cotton such as plant height, leaf area index and plant dry matter production at various stages crop growth (60,90 and 120 DAS) were greatly influenced by application of RDF NPK with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2% foliar spray either at peak flowering and boll development stages or at squaring peak flowering stages. Yield attributes of cotton viz., number of symbodial branches plant-1 , fruiting points plant -1 , bolls plant -1 and boll weight were increased in the alone promising treatments as compared to control and other treatments. As a result, higher seed cotton yield (19.29 q ha-1 ) was obtained in cotton receiving RDF and sprayed with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2% either at square formation and peak flowering or peak flowering and boll development stage. Quality characters of cotton like seed index, lint index, ginning percentage, Bartlett's index, bundle strength and fibre finess were not influenced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF with NAA and DAP influenced cotton plant height, leaf area index, and dry matter.

Treatment
RDF NPK with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2% foliar spraye0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index and plant dry matter productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, leaf area index and plant dry matter production at various stages crop growth (60,90 and 120 DAS) were greatly influenced by application of RDF NPK with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2% foliar spray either at peak flowering and boll development stages or at squaring peak flowering stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promising treatments increased yield attributes relative to controls and other treatments.

Treatment
promising treatmentse0
Outcome
number of symbodial branches plant-1 , fruiting points plant -1e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of symbodial branches plant-1 , fruiting points plant -1 , bolls plant -1 and boll weight were increased in the alone promising treatments as compared to control and other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF plus NAA and DAP produced seed cotton yield of 19.29 q ha-1.

Treatment
RDF and sprayed with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2%e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.29 q ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher seed cotton yield (19.29 q ha-1 ) was obtained in cotton receiving RDF and sprayed with NAA 40 ppm and DAP 2% either at square formation and peak flowering or peak flowering and boll development stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton quality traits were not influenced by treatment.

Outcome
seed index, lint index, ginning percentagee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality characters of cotton like seed index, lint index, ginning percentage, Bartlett's index, bundle strength and fibre finess were not influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1254 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.