Paper · 2013 · 기업교육과 인재연구

전략적 인재개발 프로세스를 적용한 핵심직무 전문가 양성사례

이진구

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries because it significantly reduces the growth vigour of the trees and accelerates their fruiting. However, the method of its propagation using 'in vitro' cultures is expensive, prompting researchers to look for alternative methods of propagation. One of these is the root formation in shoot cuttings. The experiment presented in this paper compared the use of powdered synthetic auxins (Rhizopon AA, Ukorzeniacz AB) and their alcoholic solution (IAA, IBA), and the biostimulants Goteo and Bispeed as foliar sprays for root formation in softwood cuttings 'GiSelA 5' and measured some parameters of physiological processes. In addition, two different substrates of river sand with peat (1:2) and peat substrate with perlite (2:1) were used. Cuttings were obtained on two dates, in the first and third years in the month of June. Biostimulants increased the number of rooted cuttings (Goteo-16.1%, Bispeed-18.1%) without improving their growth and the intensity of most of the analyzed physiological processes compared to the control. Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%), while simultaneously improving their growth and level of vital processes compared to the controls and biostimulants. The substrate consisting of peat with sand improved root formation by 6.2%, without significantly changing the growth parameters and vital functions of the cuttings. The earlier date of propagation increased the root formation percentage only by 4% and the number of roots by 14% of the 'GiSelA 5' rootstock cuttings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goteo biostimulant increased the number of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 16.1% compared with the control.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Goteoe1
Outcome
number of rooted cuttingse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.1%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biostimulants increased the number of rooted cuttings (Goteo-16.1%, Bispeed-18.1%) without improving their growth and the intensity of most of the analyzed physiological processes compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bispeed biostimulant increased the number of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 18.1% compared with the control.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Bispeede1
Outcome
number of rooted cuttingse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.1%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biostimulants increased the number of rooted cuttings (Goteo-16.1%, Bispeed-18.1%) without improving their growth and the intensity of most of the analyzed physiological processes compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulants did not improve growth or most analyzed physiological processes of GiSelA 5 cuttings compared with the control.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Biostimulantse1
Outcome
growth and the intensity of most of the analyzed physiological processese1
Direction
without improvinge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biostimulants increased the number of rooted cuttings (Goteo-16.1%, Bispeed-18.1%) without improving their growth and the intensity of most of the analyzed physiological processes compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopon AA increased the percentage of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 24.4%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Rhizopon AAe2
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
24.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ukorzeniacz AB increased the percentage of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 21.4%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Ukorzeniacz ABe2
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
21.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin IBA increased the percentage of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 19.7%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
auxin IBAe2
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
19.7%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxin IAA increased the percentage of rooted GiSelA 5 cuttings by 14.7%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
auxin IAAe2
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
14.7%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic preparations improved growth and vital processes of GiSelA 5 cuttings compared with the controls and biostimulants.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
Synthetic preparationse2
Outcome
growth and level of vital processese3
Direction
improvinge3
Comparator
controls and biostimulantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“Synthetic preparations also increased the percentage of rooted cuttings Rhizopon AA (24.4%), Ukorzeniacz AB (21.4%), auxin IBA (19.7%) and auxin IAA (14.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1260 · show in text ↑
e3

“while simultaneously improving their growth and level of vital processes compared to the controls and biostimulants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A substrate of peat with sand increased root formation of GiSelA 5 cuttings by 6.2%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
The substrate consisting of peat with sande4
Outcome
root formatione4
Direction
improvede4
Value
6.2%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The substrate consisting of peat with sand improved root formation by 6.2%, without significantly changing the growth parameters and vital functions of the cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A substrate of peat with sand did not significantly change growth parameters or vital functions of GiSelA 5 cuttings.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e0
Treatment
The substrate consisting of peat with sande4
Outcome
growth parameters and vital functionse4
Direction
without significantly changinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The substrate consisting of peat with sand improved root formation by 6.2%, without significantly changing the growth parameters and vital functions of the cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier propagation date increased the root formation percentage of GiSelA 5 cuttings by 4%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e5
Treatment
earlier date of propagatione5
Outcome
root formation percentagee5
Direction
increasede5
Value
4%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“The earlier date of propagation increased the root formation percentage only by 4% and the number of roots by 14% of the 'GiSelA 5' rootstock cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier propagation date increased the number of roots of GiSelA 5 cuttings by 14%.

Taxon
sweet cherriesPrunus aviume0
Material
GiSelA 5e5
Treatment
earlier date of propagatione5
Outcome
number of rootse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
14%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'GiSelA 5' rootstock is of high importance for growing sweet cherries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“The earlier date of propagation increased the root formation percentage only by 4% and the number of roots by 14% of the 'GiSelA 5' rootstock cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1695 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · growth · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.