Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agricultural Meteorology

Introducing Fluorescent Ion Probes into Attached Leave

Yasuomi IBARAKI; Junko YAMAGUCHI

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To develop methods to measure intracellular pH in an attached leaf non-destructively and to construct the pH map when the leaf responds to environment factors, ways of loading fluorescent ion probes into attached leaf cells were tested. Tested fluorescent pH probes included 5-Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate, a ratiometric probe SNARF-1/AM, and a probe for the apoplast FITC-Dextran. Fluorescence of an intact leaf was imaged by a CCD camera attached with a stereomicroscope or by a confbcal laser scanning microscope. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and leaf temperature measurements were conducted for evaluating the intensity of leaf damage by introducing the probes. As a result of testing several plant species, it was observed that the feasibility of loading the probes into attached leaf cells depended on species. In the case of species whose cells were easily loaded with the probes, submerging the attached leaf in the probe solution at room temperature for a few hours leaded to bright fluorescence in guard cells, epidermal cells and mesophyll cells. As there was no change in leaf temperature and photochemical efficiency by introducing the probes, it was suspected that no leaf damage was occurred. Path ways through which fluorescent probes can enter into attached leaf cells were also discussed from analysis of the changes in fluorescence distribution patterns in the leaf and from a comparison of the loading results under light and dark conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feasibility of probe loading into attached leaf cells depended on plant species.

Outcome
feasibility of loading the probes into attached leaf cellse0
Comparator
speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“feasibility of loading the probes into attached leaf cells depended on species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–820 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Submerging attached leaves in probe solution produced bright fluorescence in guard, epidermal and mesophyll cells in readily loaded species.

Treatment
submerging the attached leaf in the probe solutione0
Outcome
bright fluorescence in guard cells, epidermal cells and mesophyll cellse0
Value
a few hourse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“submerging the attached leaf in the probe solution at room temperature for a few hours leaded to bright fluorescence in guard cells, epidermal cells and mesophyll cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing probes did not change leaf temperature or photochemical efficiency.

Treatment
introducing the probese0
Outcome
leaf temperature and photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
no changee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no change in leaf temperature and photochemical efficiency by introducing the probes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suspected probe introduction caused no leaf damage.

Outcome
no leaf damagee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“it was suspected that no leaf damage was occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1211 · show in text ↑