Abstract
Soilless growing systems can improve water-use efficiency, especially in closed soilless growing systems. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different transplanting conditions, and determine how supplying H2O2 as an oxygen source to the rhizosphere of strawberry plants in a soilless growing system affects plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality. Strawberry plants (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cv. ‘Fortuna’ were cultivated in 12 L pots filled with peat substrate, and maintained under conditions of natural light and temperature. Treated plants were supplied with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (H1) and control plants did not receive H2O2 (H0). In terms of the transplanting conditions, the plants were transplanted in October (T1), and either maintained in a culture chamber (T2), or refrigerated (T3), for one month, before being transplanted. A completely randomized block design with two treatment factors (transplanting conditions, and H2O2 treatment) and five replications was established. Then, we determined the fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), fruit weight (g fruit−1), fruit size (mm), SPAD values, crown number, crown diameter (mm), flower number, firmness (g cm−1), pH, total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity (TA) and TSS/TA. During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values. During the late crop cycle, the H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diameter, with H1 producing the highest values. Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
In the early crop cycle, transplanting conditions and H2O2 treatment did not significantly affect fruit weight or fruit size.
- Taxon
- Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- transplanting conditionse1
- Outcome
- fruit weight and fruit sizee1
- Direction
- not significant differencese1
- Qualifier
- early crop cyclee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”
e1“During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values”
Claim · model-written summary
In the early crop cycle, T3 produced the highest fruit weight, although the difference was not significant.
- Taxon
- Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- T3e1
- Outcome
- fruit weighte1
- Direction
- highest valuese1
- Qualifier
- early crop cyclee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”
e1“During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values”
Claim · model-written summary
In the late crop cycle, H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant and crown diameter, with H1 giving the highest values.
- Taxon
- Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- H2O2 treatmente2
- Outcome
- fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diametere2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Qualifier
- late crop cyclee2
- Comparator
- control plantse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”
e2“During the late crop cycle, the H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diameter, with H1 producing the highest values”
e3“control plants did not receive H2O2 (H0)”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting conditions affected yield per plant, old SPAD values and crown diameter.
- Taxon
- Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- transplanting conditionse4
- Outcome
- yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diametere4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”
e4“Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanting conditions affected firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA of the fruit.
- Taxon
- Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- transplanting conditionse4
- Outcome
- firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TAe4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”
e4“Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA”
The same questions in other papers
hydrogen peroxide · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
transplanting · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.