Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Oxyfertigation and Transplanting Conditions of Strawberries

Pedro Palencia; Fátima Martínez; Miguel A. Vázquez

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soilless growing systems can improve water-use efficiency, especially in closed soilless growing systems. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different transplanting conditions, and determine how supplying H2O2 as an oxygen source to the rhizosphere of strawberry plants in a soilless growing system affects plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality. Strawberry plants (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cv. ‘Fortuna’ were cultivated in 12 L pots filled with peat substrate, and maintained under conditions of natural light and temperature. Treated plants were supplied with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (H1) and control plants did not receive H2O2 (H0). In terms of the transplanting conditions, the plants were transplanted in October (T1), and either maintained in a culture chamber (T2), or refrigerated (T3), for one month, before being transplanted. A completely randomized block design with two treatment factors (transplanting conditions, and H2O2 treatment) and five replications was established. Then, we determined the fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), fruit weight (g fruit−1), fruit size (mm), SPAD values, crown number, crown diameter (mm), flower number, firmness (g cm−1), pH, total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity (TA) and TSS/TA. During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values. During the late crop cycle, the H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diameter, with H1 producing the highest values. Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the early crop cycle, transplanting conditions and H2O2 treatment did not significantly affect fruit weight or fruit size.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
transplanting conditionse1
Outcome
fruit weight and fruit sizee1
Direction
not significant differencese1
Qualifier
early crop cyclee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the early crop cycle, T3 produced the highest fruit weight, although the difference was not significant.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
T3e1
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
highest valuese1
Qualifier
early crop cyclee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“During the early crop cycle, there were not significant differences between treatment and the transplanting conditions that significantly affected the fruit weight and fruit size, although T3 produced the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the late crop cycle, H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant and crown diameter, with H1 giving the highest values.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
H2O2 treatmente2
Outcome
fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diametere2
Direction
highest valuese2
Qualifier
late crop cyclee2
Comparator
control plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–423 · show in text ↑
e2

“During the late crop cycle, the H2O2 treatment affected fruit per plant, yield per plant (g plant−1), and crown diameter, with H1 producing the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1664 · show in text ↑
e3

“control plants did not receive H2O2 (H0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting conditions affected yield per plant, old SPAD values and crown diameter.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
transplanting conditionse4
Outcome
yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diametere4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–423 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting conditions affected firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA of the fruit.

Taxon
Fragaria x ananassaFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
transplanting conditionse4
Outcome
firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TAe4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fragaria x ananassa Duch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–423 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, the transplanting conditions affected yield per plant (g plant−1), old SPAD values, crown diameter, firmness, TSS, TA and TSS/TA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1807 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 8 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.