Paper · 2021 · Soil Systems

Seeding System Configuration Effects on Sunflower Seedling Emergence and Yield under No-Tillage

Gustavo F. Nardón; Guido F. Botta; Kojo A. Aikins; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

No-tillage farming can improve crop productivity and the reliability of cropping compared with conventional tillage. The effects of three different seeding system configurations on surface residue handling, sunflower emergence and stand establishment, yield, and gross income were investigated over three cropping seasons. The seeding system configurations comprised of (1) turbo coulter blade, (2) notched disc row cleaner before turbo coulter blade, and (3) no residue handling unit installed in front of a double-disc opener. For all three seeding system configurations, crop residue cover on sown rows (after seeding) was greater than the minimum recommended value of 30% for no-tillage. Residue cover was best with the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade compared to the other two seeding systems. Furthermore, the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade produced the highest plant emergence counts and the most uniform stand establishment. Sunflower yield and gross income were highest with the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade (3.16 Mg·ha−1 and 902 USD·ha−1) compared to when only the turbo coulter blade (2.38 Mg·ha−1 and 680 USD·ha−1) or no residue handling unit (1.69 Mg·ha−1 and 482 USD·ha−1) was used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All configurations retained more than 30% residue cover on sown rows.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
crop residue cover on sown rowse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all three seeding system configurations, crop residue cover on sown rows (after seeding) was greater than the minimum recommended value of 30% for no-tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The notched disc row cleaner gave the best residue cover.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter bladee0
Outcome
Residue covere0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
the other two seeding systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residue cover was best with the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade compared to the other two seeding systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The notched disc row cleaner gave the highest emergence counts and most uniform stands.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter bladee0
Outcome
plant emergence counts and the most uniform stand establishmente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade produced the highest plant emergence counts and the most uniform stand establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yield was highest at 3.16 Mg·ha−1 with the notched disc row cleaner.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter bladee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.16 Mg·ha−1e0
Qualifier
2.38 Mg·ha−1e0
Comparator
only the turbo coulter bladee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower yield and gross income were highest with the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade (3.16 Mg·ha−1 and 902 USD·ha−1) compared to when only the turbo coulter blade (2.38 Mg·ha−1 and 680 USD·ha−1) or no residue handling unit (1.69 Mg·ha−1 and 482 USD·ha−1) was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross income was highest at 902 USD·ha−1 with the notched disc row cleaner.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter bladee0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
902 USD·ha−1e0
Qualifier
482 USD·ha−1e0
Comparator
no residue handling unite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower yield and gross income were highest with the notched disc row cleaner in front of the turbo coulter blade (3.16 Mg·ha−1 and 902 USD·ha−1) compared to when only the turbo coulter blade (2.38 Mg·ha−1 and 680 USD·ha−1) or no residue handling unit (1.69 Mg·ha−1 and 482 USD·ha−1) was used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1287 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.