Paper · 2024 · Theoretical & applied problems of agro-industry

THE EFFECT OF BASIC TILLAGE ON SUNFLOWER YIELDS

FGBNU FITZ "; Yu.N. Pleskachev; Nemchinovka"; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In modern conditions the most effective way to increase the gross production of sunflower oilseeds is the selection of the most productive hybrids and realisation of their potential productivity by improving sunflower cultivation technology for specific soil and climatic conditions of the zone. Therefore, this topic is certainly relevant. Field experience was conducted on the experimental field of LLC ‘Kolos’ Mikhailovsky district of Volgograd region in 2020-2023. The main purpose of the research was to determine the optimal methods of basic cultivation, as well as a comprehensive assessment of the productivity of sunflower hybrids for the subzone of dark chestnut soils of the Volgograd region. On average for 2021-2023 years, the lowest photosynthetic potential of sunflower Suzuka was formed on the variant of disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m without the use of leaf fertilisers with microfertilisers and was equal to 1062 thousand m2 day/ha. The lowest photosynthetic potential of sunflower Suzuka was formed on the variant of disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m without the application of leaf fertilisers with microfertilisers and was equal to 1062 thousand m2 day/ha. The highest photosynthetic potential of 1755 thousand m2 day/ha was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigrain. The lowest biological yield on average for 2021-2023 years was formed on the variant of shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertiliser and was 2.04 t/ha. The highest biological yield was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigrain and was 3.02 t/ha.The lowest economic yield on average for 2021-2023 years was formed on the variant of shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertiliser and was 1.94 t/ha.On the variant with application of fertiliser Aidamin economic yield was 0.13 t/ha higher.In the variant with application of Fulvigrain fertiliser the economic yield was 0.21 t/ha more compared to the control variant.On variants of flat-cutting tillage at a depth of 0.25-0.27 m economic yield in comparison with variants on the background of disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m was 0.48-0.63 t/ha more.The highest economic yield was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of Fulvigrain fertiliser and was 2.88 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disc tillage at 0.18-0.20 m without leaf fertilisers gave the lowest photosynthetic potential of sunflower Suzuka.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
Suzukae1
Treatment
disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m without the use of leaf fertilisers with microfertiliserse1
Outcome
photosynthetic potentiale1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1062 thousand m2 day/hae1
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest photosynthetic potential of sunflower Suzuka was formed on the variant of disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m without the use of leaf fertilisers with microfertilisers and was equal to 1062 thousand m2 day/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing to 0.25-0.27 m with Fulvigrain gave the highest photosynthetic potential of sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigraine2
Outcome
photosynthetic potentiale2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1755 thousand m2 day/hae2
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest photosynthetic potential of 1755 thousand m2 day/ha was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigrain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow disc cultivation without leaf fertiliser gave the lowest biological yield of sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertilisere3
Outcome
biological yielde3
Direction
loweste3
Value
2.04 t/hae3
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest biological yield on average for 2021-2023 years was formed on the variant of shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertiliser and was 2.04 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing to 0.25-0.27 m with Fulvigrain gave the highest biological yield of sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigraine4
Outcome
biological yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.02 t/hae4
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest biological yield was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of fertiliser Fulvigrain and was 3.02 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow disc cultivation without leaf fertiliser gave the lowest economic yield of sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertilisere5
Outcome
economic yielde5
Direction
loweste5
Value
1.94 t/hae5
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lowest economic yield on average for 2021-2023 years was formed on the variant of shallow disc cultivation without application of leaf fertiliser and was 1.94 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aidamin fertiliser increased sunflower economic yield by 0.13 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
application of fertiliser Aidamine6
Outcome
economic yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
0.13 t/hae6
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e6

“On the variant with application of fertiliser Aidamin economic yield was 0.13 t/ha higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–1954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fulvigrain fertiliser increased sunflower economic yield by 0.21 t/ha compared with control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
application of Fulvigrain fertilisere7
Outcome
economic yielde7
Direction
moree7
Value
0.21 t/hae7
Comparator
control variante7
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e7

“In the variant with application of Fulvigrain fertiliser the economic yield was 0.21 t/ha more compared to the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat-cutting tillage at 0.25-0.27 m increased economic yield by 0.48-0.63 t/ha over disc tillage at 0.18-0.20 m.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
flat-cutting tillage at a depth of 0.25-0.27 me2
Outcome
economic yielde2
Direction
moree2
Value
0.48-0.63 t/hae2
Comparator
disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 me2
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e2

“On variants of flat-cutting tillage at a depth of 0.25-0.27 m economic yield in comparison with variants on the background of disc tillage at a depth of 0.18-0.20 m was 0.48-0.63 t/ha more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2082–2270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing to 0.25-0.27 m with Fulvigrain gave the highest economic yield of sunflower, 2.88 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of Fulvigrain fertilisere2
Outcome
economic yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
2.88 t/hae2
Setting
Volgograd regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SUNFLOWER YIELDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“Volgograd region in 2020-2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest economic yield was formed on the variant of ploughing to a depth of 0.25-0.27 m with the application of Fulvigrain fertiliser and was 2.88 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2426 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

tillage · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 50 positive, 20 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

tillage · physiology: photosynthesis · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.