Paper · 2021 · KOREAN JOURNAL OF PACKAGING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Effect of Growth Temperature and MA Storage on Quality and Storability of Red Romaine Baby Leaves

강원대학교 스마트농업융합학과; Dam Hee Choi; Joo Hwan Lee; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the quality of baby leaves grown under several temperature conditions and the storage properties of MA storage for romaine lettuce. It was grown for 5 weeks under an artificial light source (200 μmol·m-2·s-1) in a chamber at 21oC, 28oC, and 35oC. The growth and quality of red romaine lettuce that grown in different temperatures were investigated at the end of cultivation, and the oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene concentrations in the 20,000 cc OTR film and perforated film packed with lettuces were measured for 36 and 12 days, respectively. The red romaine lettuce baby leaf was examined for color, chlorophyll, and visual quality at the end of storage. The maximum quantum yield of baby leaf grown in different temperatures at 7days before the harvest was higher at 21oC and 28oC growth temperature treatments. On harvest day, the leaf length measured was longest at 28oC, and the leaf width was wider at 21oC and 28oC, and the number of leaves was similar to 5-6 at all cultivation temperatures. Leaf weight, root weight, and dry weight were found to be higher at 21oC, and tended to decrease as the cultivation temperature increased. The concentration of ethylene in the film of the MA storage treatments was maintained at 1~2 μL·L-1 until the end of storage in all treatments regardless of the cultivation temperature. Oxygen concentration in the MA treatment used 20,000 OTR film was maintained at around 19.5%, and carbon dioxide concentration around 1% that was satisfied the CA conditions. Both Hunter a* and b* values were generally higher in the MA storage treatment at the end of storage day. The chlorophyll content was decreased as the cultivation temperature increased, and was lower in the MA storage treatment than in the perforated film treatment. Visual quality was 3 points or higher in the MA storage treatment at 21oC growth treatment, and it was maintained marketability. As the above results, the growth of baby leaves of romaine lettuce was the best at 21oC treatment, and the lower the cultivation temperature, the longer the shelf life. And it was possible to extend the shelf life by 3 times by showing excellent visual quality at the MA storage treatment that satisfies the carbon dioxide concentration of CA condition until the end of storage day.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum quantum yield of baby leaves 7 days before harvest was higher at 21oC and 28oC growth temperatures.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
growth temperaturee0
Outcome
maximum quantum yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum quantum yield of baby leaf grown in different temperatures at 7days before the harvest was higher at 21oC and 28oC growth temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length at harvest was longest at 28oC.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
28oCe0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
longeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf length measured was longest at 28oC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf width at harvest was wider at 21oC and 28oC.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
21oC and 28oCe0
Outcome
leaf widthe0
Direction
widere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf width was wider at 21oC and 28oC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of leaves was similar, 5-6, at all cultivation temperatures.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
cultivation temperaturese0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
similare0
Value
5-6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of leaves was similar to 5-6 at all cultivation temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf weight, root weight and dry weight were higher at 21oC and tended to decrease as cultivation temperature increased.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
cultivation temperaturee0
Outcome
Leaf weight, root weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf weight, root weight, and dry weight were found to be higher at 21oC, and tended to decrease as the cultivation temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene concentration in the film of MA storage treatments stayed at 1~2 uL/L until the end of storage regardless of cultivation temperature.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
MA storage treatmentse0
Outcome
concentration of ethylenee0
Value
1~2 μL·L-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of ethylene in the film of the MA storage treatments was maintained at 1~2 μL·L-1 until the end of storage in all treatments regardless of the cultivation temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen concentration in the MA treatment with 20,000 OTR film stayed around 19.5%.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
20,000 OTR filme0
Outcome
Oxygen concentratione0
Value
around 19.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Oxygen concentration in the MA treatment used 20,000 OTR film was maintained at around 19.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide concentration in the MA treatment stayed around 1%, satisfying CA conditions.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Outcome
carbon dioxide concentratione0
Value
around 1%e0

Verbatim

e0

“carbon dioxide concentration around 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hunter a* and b* values were generally higher in the MA storage treatment at the end of storage.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
MA storage treatmente0
Outcome
Hunter a* and b* valuese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both Hunter a* and b* values were generally higher in the MA storage treatment at the end of storage day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content decreased as cultivation temperature increased.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
cultivation temperaturee0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content was decreased as the cultivation temperature increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was lower in the MA storage treatment than in the perforated film treatment.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
MA storage treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
perforated film treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content was decreased as the cultivation temperature increased, and was lower in the MA storage treatment than in the perforated film treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visual quality was 3 points or higher in the MA storage treatment at 21oC growth temperature, maintaining marketability.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
MA storage treatmente0
Outcome
Visual qualitye0
Value
3 points or highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Visual quality was 3 points or higher in the MA storage treatment at 21oC growth treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower the cultivation temperature, the longer the shelf life.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
cultivation temperaturee0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
longere0

Verbatim

e0

“the lower the cultivation temperature, the longer the shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MA storage with carbon dioxide at CA condition extended shelf life by 3 times through excellent visual quality.

Taxon
Red Romainet0
Treatment
MA storage treatmente0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
extende0
Value
3 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“possible to extend the shelf life by 3 times by showing excellent visual quality at the MA storage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Romaine Baby Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97 · show in text ↑