Paper · 2021 · British Food Journal

Color, microstructure, physicochemical, textural and sensory properties with the retention of secondary metabolites in convective-, microwave- and freeze-dried carrot (Daucus carota) slices

Gulcin Yildiz

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Purpose This work was undertaken to evaluate the impact of different drying methods (convective, microwave and freeze drying) on color, selected secondary metabolites (total phenolic substances, ascorbic acid, beta-carotene and antioxidant capacity), texture (hardness), sensory properties and microstructure of carrot slices. Design/methodology/approach Convective drying at three different temperatures (55, 65 and 75 °C), microwave drying at two different power levels (100 and 200 W) and freeze drying were applied. Findings Significant differences were found among fresh and dried-carrot slices. Convective-dried carrots showed better quality characteristics in comparison with microwave-dried carrots. The convective-dried carrots at 65 °C exhibited the highest retention of bioactive compounds and best color among all convective drying conditions. The microwave-dried carrot slices at lower power (100 W) showed higher quality characteristics compared to the dried carrots at 200 W. The freeze-dried carrots exhibited the highest retention of secondary metabolites, sensory properties and best color among all drying methods. Originality/value The results from this study are significant for the processing of dried carrots by optimizing the conditions to obtain a high-quality product. Overall, freeze drying is a promising application as shown in the present study by its capability to better retention carrot quality underlying color, sensory, texture, microstructure and secondary metabolites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dried carrot slices differed significantly.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Outcome
differencese0
Comparator
fresh and dried-carrot slicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were found among fresh and dried-carrot slices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convective-dried carrots had better quality than microwave-dried carrots.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Convective-driede0
Outcome
quality characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
microwave-dried carrotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Convective-dried carrots showed better quality characteristics in comparison with microwave-dried carrots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Convective drying at 65 °C gave the highest bioactive-compound retention and best color among convective conditions.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
convective-dried carrots at 65 °Ce0
Outcome
retention of bioactive compounds and best colore0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all convective drying conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The convective-dried carrots at 65 °C exhibited the highest retention of bioactive compounds and best color among all convective drying conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying at 100 W produced higher quality than 200 W.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
lower power (100 W)e0
Outcome
quality characteristicse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
200 We0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microwave-dried carrot slices at lower power (100 W) showed higher quality characteristics compared to the dried carrots at 200 W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freeze-dried carrots had the highest retention of secondary metabolites, sensory properties and best color across methods.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
freeze-driede0
Outcome
retention of secondary metabolites, sensory properties and best colore0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all drying methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The freeze-dried carrots exhibited the highest retention of secondary metabolites, sensory properties and best color among all drying methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1133 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.