Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Effect of Soil-Applied L-tryptophan on the Amount of Biomass and Nitrogen and Sulfur Utilization by Maize

Krzysztof Gondek; Monika Mierzwa-Hersztek

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As natural plant growth stimulators, amino acids are widely used to improve crop yield and quality. There are numerous studies documenting the influence of amino acids on plants, which is not always positive. This study was conducted to determine the effect of soil-applied L-tryptophan (L-TRP) on the accumulation and utilization of nitrogen and sulfur by maize. The study was carried out under the conditions of a pot experiment. The experimental design included three treatments: soil without fertilization (control), soil with mineral fertilization (NPKS), and soil with mineral fertilization and L-tryptophan addition (NPKS + L-TRP). The application of tryptophan to the soil, supported by mineral fertilization, caused a significant increase in maize biomass. Although no significant differences in nitrogen and sulfur contents in maize biomass were found between treatments without and with the addition of L-tryptophan, significantly higher intakes of both elements were observed in the NPKS + L-TRP treatment. The application of L-tryptophan increased the biosynthesis of Chlorophyll a. Utilization of nitrogen and sulfur by maize in the NPKS + L-TRP treatment was more than 27% and 17% higher, respectively, compared to the NPKS treatment. Maintaining the recommended contents of individual nutrients in the rhizosphere is not a guarantee of optimal quantitative and qualitative intake of nutrients. Problems with maintaining optimal relationships between individual nutrients may be compounded by soil properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding tryptophan with mineral fertilizer significantly increased maize biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
application of tryptophan to the soile0
Outcome
maize biomasse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of tryptophan to the soil, supported by mineral fertilization, caused a significant increase in maize biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen content did not significantly differ with L-tryptophan addition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
addition of L-tryptophane0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
treatments withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in nitrogen and sulfur contents in maize biomass were found between treatments without and with the addition of L-tryptophan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur content did not significantly differ with L-tryptophan addition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
addition of L-tryptophane0
Outcome
sulfur contentse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
treatments withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences in nitrogen and sulfur contents in maize biomass were found between treatments without and with the addition of L-tryptophan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen intake was significantly higher with L-tryptophan.

Treatment
NPKS + L-TRP treatmente0
Outcome
intakes of both elementse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher intakes of both elements were observed in the NPKS + L-TRP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L-tryptophan increased chlorophyll a biosynthesis.

Treatment
application of L-tryptophane0
Outcome
biosynthesis of Chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of L-tryptophan increased the biosynthesis of Chlorophyll a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen utilization was over 27% higher with NPKS plus L-TRP than NPKS alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NPKS + L-TRP treatmente0
Outcome
Utilization of nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
more than 27%e0
Comparator
NPKS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Utilization of nitrogen and sulfur by maize in the NPKS + L-TRP treatment was more than 27% and 17% higher, respectively, compared to the NPKS treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur utilization was over 17% higher with NPKS plus L-TRP than NPKS alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NPKS + L-TRP treatmente0
Outcome
sulfure0
Direction
highere0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
NPKS treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Utilization of nitrogen and sulfur by maize in the NPKS + L-TRP treatment was more than 27% and 17% higher, respectively, compared to the NPKS treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1248 · show in text ↑

tryptophan · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

L-tryptophan · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

L-tryptophan · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.