Paper · 2021 · Journal of Productivity and Development

EFFECT OF FOLIAR SPRAY WITH UREA AND DRY YEAST EXTRACT ON HEAD LETTUCE PRODUCTION

Ahmed Abd El Galil; Essam Abou El-Salehein; Mahmoud El Hamady

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out during the two successive seasons of 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 at Abo El-Matameer, Behairah Governorate, Egypt to study the effect of seven treatments a foliar application, i.e. control (spray with water only), dry yeast at 2g/L, dry yeast at 4 g/L, urea at 0.5%, urea at 1.0%, urea at 1.5%, and urea at 2% on growth, yield and chemical content of lettuce plants. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete blocks design in three replications. The obtained results are summarized as follows: Using urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spray on vegetative growth characters, i.e. root length, head length, number of leaves/head, length and width of leaf, diameter of head , fresh and dry weight of head, pigments content ,chemical contents and head yield of lettuce and its components were significantly increased compared to the control treatment. The highest values of these characters of lettuce were recorded by using 1% urea, in both growing seasons. This treatment was followed by the treatments of dry yeast extract at 4 g/L, dry yeast extract at 2 g/L, and urea at 0.5%, respectively. Conclusively: It can be concluded that the treatment of 1% urea gave the best results on all characters of head lettuce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea and dry yeast extract significantly increased lettuce root and head length, leaf number, leaf dimensions, and head diameter compared with water spray.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spraye0
Outcome
root length, head length, number of leaves/head, length and width of leaf, diameter of heade0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spray on vegetative growth characters, i.e. root length, head length, number of leaves/head, length and width of leaf, diameter of head , fresh and dry weight of head, pigments content ,chemical contents and head yield of lettuce and its components were significantly increased compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea and dry yeast extract significantly increased lettuce head fresh and dry weight and head yield compared with the control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spraye0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of head, pigments content ,chemical contents and head yield of lettuce and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spray on vegetative growth characters, i.e. root length, head length, number of leaves/head, length and width of leaf, diameter of head , fresh and dry weight of head, pigments content ,chemical contents and head yield of lettuce and its components were significantly increased compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea and dry yeast extract significantly increased lettuce pigment and chemical contents compared with the control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spraye0
Outcome
pigments content ,chemical contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using urea and dry yeast extract levels as a foliar spray on vegetative growth characters, i.e. root length, head length, number of leaves/head, length and width of leaf, diameter of head , fresh and dry weight of head, pigments content ,chemical contents and head yield of lettuce and its components were significantly increased compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% urea treatment gave the highest values for the reported lettuce characters in both seasons.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
1% ureae0
Outcome
highest values of these characterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of these characters of lettuce were recorded by using 1% urea, in both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast extract at 4 g/L ranked after 1% urea for the reported lettuce characters.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
dry yeast extract at 4 g/Le0
Outcome
followede0
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was followed by the treatments of dry yeast extract at 4 g/L, dry yeast extract at 2 g/L, and urea at 0.5%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“HEAD LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast extract at 2 g/L ranked after dry yeast extract at 4 g/L for the reported lettuce characters.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
dry yeast extract at 2 g/Le0
Outcome
followede0
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was followed by the treatments of dry yeast extract at 4 g/L, dry yeast extract at 2 g/L, and urea at 0.5%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“HEAD LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea at 0.5% ranked after dry yeast extract at 2 g/L for the reported lettuce characters.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
urea at 0.5%e0
Outcome
followede0
Direction
followede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment was followed by the treatments of dry yeast extract at 4 g/L, dry yeast extract at 2 g/L, and urea at 0.5%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“HEAD LETTUCE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 1% urea gave the best results for all head lettuce characters.

Taxon
head lettucee0
Outcome
1% urea gave the best results on all characters of head lettucee0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 1% urea gave the best results on all characters of head lettuce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1271 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 61 positive, 18 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.