Abstract
This study was carried out in a private orchard, at Kafr El-Dwar, El-Behera Governorate, on "GrandNain" banana plants (Musa cavendishii Lamb.) during the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 growing seasons. Twelve treatments of different Humic acid (HA), potassium (K) and Magneisum (Mg) HA:K:Mg ratios were applied. The results indicated that there were great effects on growth aspects, yield, physical and chemical properties and leaf mineral content with varying HA:K:Mg ratios. Since increasing HA:K:Mg rates from 0 to 10 gm/plant, K from 0 to 300 gm/plant and Mg from 0 to 150 gm/plant/year caused a remarkable promotion on all studied parameters. Leaf potassium and magnesium contents were increased with increasing the applied potassium and magnesium fertilizer rates. On the other hand, results did not show a constant trend due to different treatments in respect with phosphorus, but did not affect nitrogen content. The best treatment was obtained with using (HA:K:Mg) at rate of 10 gm/plant Humic acid, 300 gm potassium sulfate and 150 gm magnesium sulfate for all studied parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing fertilizer rates promoted growth, yield, physical and chemical properties and leaf mineral content.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- increasing HA:K:Mg rates from 0 to 10 gm/plant, K from 0 to 300 gm/plant and Mg from 0 to 150 gm/plant/yeare0
- Outcome
- all studied parameterse0
- Direction
- promotione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“increasing HA:K:Mg rates from 0 to 10 gm/plant, K from 0 to 300 gm/plant and Mg from 0 to 150 gm/plant/year caused a remarkable promotion on all studied parameters”
t0“Banana”
t1“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher potassium and magnesium fertilizer rates increased leaf potassium and magnesium contents.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- increasing the applied potassium and magnesium fertilizer ratese0
- Outcome
- Leaf potassium and magnesium contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Leaf potassium and magnesium contents were increased with increasing the applied potassium and magnesium fertilizer rates”
t0“Banana”
t1“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus showed no constant trend across treatments.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“results did not show a constant trend due to different treatments in respect with phosphorus”
t0“Banana”
t1“Banana”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not affect nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- bananat0
- Treatment
- Humic Acid, Potassium and Magnesium Fertilizationt0
- Outcome
- nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“did not affect nitrogen content”
t0“Banana to Humic Acid, Potassium and Magnesium Fertilization”
t1“Banana to Humic Acid, Potassium and Magnesium Fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
The 10/300/150 gm fertilizer combination was best for the studied parameters.
Verbatim
e0“The best treatment was obtained with using (HA:K:Mg) at rate of 10 gm/plant Humic acid, 300 gm potassium sulfate and 150 gm magnesium sulfate for all studied parameters”
t0“Banana”
t1“Banana”
The same questions in other papers
magnesium atom · nutrient: content · MusaResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →other · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
potassium · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.