Abstract
Fifty nine wild and cultivated banana genotypes (Musa spp.) including 10 diploids (AA, AB and BB genome) and 49 triploids (AAA, AAB, ABB) belonging to the Eumusa section, were evaluated for their host reaction against the burrowing nematode (Radopholus similis) under greenhouse conditions. Reduction in plant growth parameters was comparatively higher in susceptible genotypes when inoculated with nematodes. Root studies indicated higher number of roots, root fresh and dry weight in resistant and tolerant accessions even after nematode inoculation. Based on the corm grade, root necrosis percentage and the reproduction rate of nematode, the level of resistance to R. similis was assessed. The experiment revealed that the diploid accessions, Kanai Bansi (AA), Elakkiebale (AB), M. balbisiana (BB), Bhimkol (BB), Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant. Among triploids, Kothia (ABB) and Ankur II (ABB) were resistant to R. similis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode-inoculated susceptible banana genotypes had a comparatively larger reduction in plant growth parameters.
- Material
- susceptible genotypese0
- Treatment
- inoculated with nematodese0
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- Reductione0
MusaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reduction in plant growth parameters was comparatively higher in susceptible genotypes when inoculated with nematodes.”
t0“Indian Musa Germplasm”
Claim · model-written summary
Resistant and tolerant banana accessions retained higher root number and root fresh and dry weight after nematode inoculation.
- Material
- resistant and tolerant accessionse0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- nematode inoculatione0
- Outcome
- number of roots, root fresh and dry weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Root studies indicated higher number of roots, root fresh and dry weight in resistant and tolerant accessions even after nematode inoculation.”
t0“Indian Musa Germplasm”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid Kanai Bansi (AA) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Kanai Bansi (AA)e0
- Interactor
- R. similis
Radopholus similise1pathogen - Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the diploid accessions, Kanai Bansi (AA), Elakkiebale (AB), M. balbisiana (BB), Bhimkol (BB), Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid Elakkiebale (AB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Elakkiebale (AB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise1pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Elakkiebale (AB), M. balbisiana (BB), Bhimkol (BB), Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid M. balbisiana (BB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Taxon
- M. balbisiana
Musa balbisianae0 - Material
- M. balbisiana (BB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise1pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M. balbisiana (BB), Bhimkol (BB), Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid Bhimkol (BB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Bhimkol (BB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise1pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bhimkol (BB), Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid Athiakol (BB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Athiakol (BB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise1pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Athiakol (BB) and Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Diploid Aittakola (BB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Aittakola (BB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise1pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aittakola (BB) were resistant.”
e1“resistant to R. similis”
Claim · model-written summary
Triploid Kothia (ABB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Kothia (ABB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise0pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among triploids, Kothia (ABB) and Ankur II (ABB) were resistant to R. similis.”
Claim · model-written summary
Triploid Ankur II (ABB) was resistant to R. similis.
- Material
- Ankur II (ABB)e0
- Interactor
- R. similisRadopholus similise0pathogen
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among triploids, Kothia (ABB) and Ankur II (ABB) were resistant to R. similis.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Nematoda · MusaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.