Claim · model-written summary
Lime peel extract was encapsulated with a yield of 79.5%.
MusaVerbatim
e0“propagating Musa spp. explants”
e1“LPE was encapsulated with a yield of 79.5%”
Title
Nandang Permadi; Pramesthi Reitza Navisya Vasall; Farah Aprisza Sheelmarevaa; et al. Scientific Reports 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57037-9
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Method / resource Encapsulation efficiency of the lime peel extract microbeads was 80.93%.
- Method / resource Extract content of the lime peel extract microbeads was 24.2%.
- Observation The microbeads averaged 1.2 μm in size.
- Observation The microbeads were approximately spherical with a slightly irregular surface.
- Observation Release of the lime peel extract from the microbeads followed kinetics consistent with the Korsmeyer-Peppas model.
- Observation Lime peel extract release from the microbeads was delayed.
- Observation The microbeads maintained 23.26% extract content over three weeks.
- Observation The microbeads maintained 77.8% encapsulation efficiency over three weeks.
- Observation The microbeads showed thermal stability up to 100 °C.
- Intervention effect LPE microbeads reduced the browning index in Kepok Tanjung explants more than unencapsulated LPE.
- Intervention effect LPE microbeads reduced the browning index in Barangan explants more than unencapsulated LPE.