Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Mallawi Agriculture Research Station, Minia Governorate, Egypt, during the two successive seasons (2018/2019 and 2019/2020). The experiments were allocated in a spilt plot design with three replicates. The main plots assigned to four biofertilization treatments i.e. control, Azospirllium ssp, Pseudomonas ssp and mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp). The sub plots were devoted for three levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (50, 75, and 100% of RD "(90 kg N) and 31 kg P2O5 (15.5%)". Sugar beet plant growth, microbial densities in the rhizosphere, root yield, Physical and chemical properties of sugar beet roots and recoverable sugar yield (tonfed) were studied. Generally application of the above mentioned fertilizers individually or interaction resulted in a significant effect on all the studied traits in both seasons as compared with the control. On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?. On the other hand, treatment of 100% of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers gave the highest values of all the studied characters. The interactions between biofertilizers, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers significantly affected the studied traits in both seasons. Under the conditions of present work, the results suggest that sugar beet inoculated with a mixture of Azospirllium ssp, Pseudomonas ssp combined with 75 % RD of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (204.5 &150 kg/fed) is highly recommended to obtain the highest yield of sugar beet.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application significantly affected all studied traits of sugar beet compared with the control
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- application of the above mentioned fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- all the studied traitse1
- Comparator
- the controle1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e1“Generally application of the above mentioned fertilizers individually or interaction resulted in a significant effect on all the studied traits in both seasons as compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas gave the highest microbial densities in the rhizosphere of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas sspe2
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe2symbiont
- Outcome
- microbial densities in the rhizospheree2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e2“On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas gave the highest plant growth parameters of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas sspe2
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe2symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e2“On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas gave the highest root yield of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas sspe2
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe2symbiont
- Outcome
- root yielde2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e2“On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas gave the highest recoverable sugar yield of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas sspe2
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe2symbiont
- Outcome
- recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed)e2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e2“On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizer mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas gave the highest physical and chemical properties of sugar beet roots
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas sspe2
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe2symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe2symbiont
- Outcome
- physical and chemical properties of rootse2
- Direction
- highest valuese2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e2“On one hand the biofertilizer consisted of a mixture of Azospirllium ssp and Pseudomonas ssp recorded the highest values of microbial densities in the rhizosphere, plant growth parameters root yield, recoverable sugar yield (ton/fed), physical and chemical properties of roots and obtained sugar compare with other treatments?”
Claim · model-written summary
100% of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers gave the highest values of all studied characters of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 100% of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizerse3
- Outcome
- all the studied characterse3
- Direction
- highest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e3“On the other hand, treatment of 100% of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers gave the highest values of all the studied characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Interactions between biofertilizers and N and P fertilizers significantly affected the studied traits of sugar beet
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- biofertilizers, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizerse4
- Outcome
- the studied traitse4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e4“The interactions between biofertilizers, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers significantly affected the studied traits in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
A mixture of Azospirillum and Pseudomonas with 75% RD of N and P fertilizers is recommended for the highest sugar beet yield
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise5
- Treatment
- inoculated with a mixture of Azospirllium ssp, Pseudomonas sspe5
- Interactor
- Azospirllium sspe5symbiont
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas sspe5symbiont
- Outcome
- highest yield of sugar beete5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Quality of Sugar Beet”
e5“sugar beet inoculated with a mixture of Azospirllium ssp, Pseudomonas ssp combined with 75 % RD of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (204.5 &150 kg/fed) is highly recommended to obtain the highest yield of sugar beet”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →inoculation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.