Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant and Environment

Standardization of Growing Media for Grapes Nursery Production

Muhammad Saqib; Kashif Razzaq; Sami Ullah; et al.

12
claims
39
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nursery production of grapes in soil-based media causes higher mortality due to soil-borne diseases including root rot, damping off, phytophthora and die back etc. The study was planned to explore the potential of various growing media for the nursery production of grapes cv. Sultana-C through cuttings. Six different growing media including peat moss, silt, sugarcane bagasse, saw dust, coconut fiber and farm yard manure alone and in different combinations (16) were tested. Treatments were arranged under Completely Randomized Design (CRD) and replicated five times. Results indicated that grapes cutting planted in (GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1) exhibited highest sprouting percentage (100%) and significant results for shoots and roots length (41.4 and 40.4 cm respectively), inter-nodal distance (3.4 cm), leaf area (78.93 cm), no. of leaves (12.3), shoots diameter (10.43 cm) and fresh weight of shoots and roots (17.35 and 19.84 g) as compared to other growing media. Maximum mortality percentage was observed in media (GM6) containing Silt + FYM (1:1) and (GM18) sawdust + FYM + coconut fiber (1:1:1). Conclusively, the combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1) has been proved highly significant for survival and growth of grapes nursery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced the highest sprouting percentage, 100%.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e0
Outcome
sprouting percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
other growing mediae1

Verbatim

e0

“grapes cutting planted in (GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1) exhibited highest sprouting percentage (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–738 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced shoot length of 41.4 cm.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
shoots and roots lengthe0
Value
41.4e0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant results for shoots and roots length (41.4 and 40.4 cm respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced root length of 40.4 cm.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
roots lengthe0
Value
40.4 cme0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“significant results for shoots and roots length (41.4 and 40.4 cm respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced internodal distance of 3.4 cm.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
inter-nodal distancee0
Value
3.4 cme0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“inter-nodal distance (3.4 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–853 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced leaf area of 78.93 cm.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Value
78.93 cme0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (78.93 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced 12.3 leaves.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
no. of leavese0
Value
12.3e0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no. of leaves (12.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced shoot diameter of 10.43 cm.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
shoots diametere0
Value
10.43 cme0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“shoots diameter (10.43 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced shoot fresh weight of 17.35 g.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
fresh weight of shootse0
Value
17.35e0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of shoots and roots (17.35 and 19.84 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GM13 produced root fresh weight of 19.84 g.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e1
Outcome
fresh weight of shoots and rootse0
Value
19.84 ge0
Comparator
other growing mediae2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of shoots and roots (17.35 and 19.84 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“(GM13) media combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to other growing media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM6 had maximum cutting mortality.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM6) containing Silt + FYM (1:1)e0
Outcome
mortality percentagee0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum mortality percentage was observed in media (GM6) containing Silt + FYM (1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM18 had maximum cutting mortality.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
(GM18) sawdust + FYM + coconut fiber (1:1:1)e0
Outcome
mortality percentagee0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum mortality percentage was observed in media (GM6) containing Silt + FYM (1:1) and (GM18) sawdust + FYM + coconut fiber (1:1:1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the bagasse, silt and sawdust mixture for grape nursery survival and growth.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1)e0
Outcome
survival and growth of grapes nurserye0

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of sugarcane bagasse, silt and saw dust (1:1:1) has been proved highly significant for survival and growth of grapes nursery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1308 · show in text ↑

growing medium · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · pest · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

growing medium · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

in vitro · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

growing medium · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.