Paper · 2025 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Standardization of growing media for survival and growth of Hardwood cuttings of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to evaluate “Standardization of growing media for survival and growth of hardwood cuttings of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Thompson Seedless” which was conducted at the Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Prayagraj, U.P-211007 during the year 2022-2023. The experiment consists of 12 treatment of five different growing media i.e., Sugarcane bagasse, sawdust, coco peat, FYM and sand at different ratio and a rooting hormone IBA @200ppm for cutting treatment in a randomized block design in three replications. The main objective of the experiment was to evaluate the vegetative growth and root of grapes vine with their success and survival percentage. From the present investigation treatment T3 (Sand + Coco peat (2:1) + IBA @200 ppm) recorded significantly with maximum sprouting percentage (68.8%) and showed the best root growth parameters with maximum root length. It also showed best vegetative growth parameters i.e., highest shoot length, maximum number of leaves with higher plant height. However highest survival percentage 83.8% also recorded in T3.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave maximum sprouting of 68.8%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Sand + Coco peat (2:1) + IBA @200 ppme0
Outcome
sprouting percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
68.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T3 (Sand + Coco peat (2:1) + IBA @200 ppm) recorded significantly with maximum sprouting percentage (68.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave maximum root length.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
growing mediat0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“showed the best root growth parameters with maximum root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“growing media for survival and growth of Hardwood cuttings of Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 gave highest shoot length, leaf number and plant height.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
growing mediat0
Outcome
shoot length, maximum number of leaves with higher plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“It also showed best vegetative growth parameters i.e., highest shoot length, maximum number of leaves with higher plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“growing media for survival and growth of Hardwood cuttings of Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced the highest cutting survival at 83.8%.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
survival percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
83.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest survival percentage 83.8% also recorded in T3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

54 papers: 47 positive, 7 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

growing medium · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.